Skip to main content
The Journal of Basic and Applied Zoology

Table 4 Correlation of morphometric data of Hemicriconemoides rosae isolate HCN was determined by two tailed Pearson’s correlation

From: Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Hemicriconemoides rosae (Rathour et al., 2003) from mustard rhizosphere in India

 

L

a

b

c

c’

V

L

1

0.6978**

0.3446

0.3492

0.1044

0.3261

a

0.6978**

1

0.2484

0.3704

 − 0.01959

0.3505

b

0.3446

0.2484

1

0.5689*

 − 0.4858

0.1374

c

0.3492

0.3704

0.5689*

1

 − 0.6779**

0.5414*

c’

0.1044

 − 0.01959

 − 0.4858

 − 0.6779**

1

 − 0.08350

V

0.3261

0.3505

0.1374

0.5414*

 − 0.08350

1

EP

0.9651***

0.7389**

0.3727

0.3506

0.1033

0.3744

NR

0.5820*

0.4458

 − 0.3041

 − 0.05316

0.4115

0.5198*

PL

0.5990*

0.4690

 − 0.5443*

 − 0.1700

0.4952

0.1685

EBL

0.6816**

0.6953**

0.1143

0.4009

 − 0.2365

0.1240

T

0.5458*

0.2028

0.05948

 − 0.3330

0.5966*

 − 0.04380

Body diameter: anus

0.5670*

0.4774

 − 0.07373

 − 0.1201

0.09106

0.1515

Body diameter: mid-body

0.5379*

0.4317

0.2305

 − 0.01556

0.009445

 − 0.1235

VDesh

0.9715***

0.7538**

0.3453

0.4479

0.07187

0.5407*

Stylet

0.5498*

0.1846

 − 0.1253

 − 0.1770

0.1626

 − 0.1398

MBL

0.5448*

0.4334

 − 0.02157

0.09194

0.1999

0.5293*

WV

0.5872*

0.4855

0.1949

0.1943

0.06458

0.1955

  1. Bold and asterisk (*) values represent the statistical difference. p < 0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference
  2. *Shows statistical significant; Pearson’s correlation
  3. *Shows p < 0.05, ** shows p < 0.01, *** shows p < 0.001
Back to article page