- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Effects of anthropogenic disturbances on adult Odonata fauna in Akure, south west Nigeria
The Journal of Basic and Applied Zoology volume 85, Article number: 56 (2024)
Abstract
Background
Human activities such as deforestation, urbanization, industrialization, canalization, and water abstraction, negatively affect biodiversity. This study was carried out to determine the effect of anthropogenic activities on the composition, distribution, and abundance of Odonata of Akure South Local Government Area.
Results
A total of 2376 Odonata individuals (1363 dragonflies and 1013 damselflies) in 6 families (Libellulidae, Ceonagrionidae, Calopterygidae, Platycnemididae, Chlorocyphidae) and Gomphidae, 19 genera and 36 species were recorded in this study. Pseudagrion ‘A’ kersteni (651) is the most frequent species followed closely by Trithemis arteriosa, they were found in all the sites, therefore are generalists. Eight species including Lestinogomphus minutus, Pantala flavescens, Copera sikassoensis, etc., are least represented in the study, they were made up of one individual each. Leo study site has the richest odonate fauna (Simpson dominance: 0.8497, Shannon–Wiener H_: 2.234 and Margalef: 3.021); while, the least was Oda (Simpson dominance: 0.7899 and Shannon Wiener H_: 1.932). The distribution of the species was highest at Oda (evenness E: 0.4931), followed closely by Leo (evenness E: 0.4916); while, Ijapo (evenness E: 0.3852) is the least.
Conclusion
The few stenotopic species and, proliferation of eurytopic species in the study sites proved that the sites are undergoing intense anthropogenic disturbance and conservation efforts must therefore be put in place to prevent the extinction of these species and their restoration in sites they were absent.
Background
The Order Odonata is a well-studied aquatic insect inhabiting freshwater ecosystems although some species have been observed to live in brackish water (Watanabe et al., 2007). Odonata has three suborders—Anisoptera (dragonfly), Zygoptera (damselfly) and Anisozygoptera which has traits that, at first glance, resemble those of the Anisopterans, and its wings also resemble those of the Zygoptera (Bybee et al., 2021). The larvae of this suborder also exhibit characteristics shared by the Zygoptera and Anisoptera. The various Odonata have varying geographic distributions. Some genera and species have a broad distribution; while, others have a narrow distribution (Kadoya et al., 2004). Some species are ubiquitous, such as Palpopleura portia (Drury, 1773) and Orthetrum julia (Kirby, 1900) (Corbet, 1999), and are occasionally observed migrating far from their home. Due to its long lifetime and amphibious tendencies, Odonata is perfect for evaluating environmental changes that occur both above and below the water surface, including short-term changes in conservation biology and long-term changes in biogeography and climatology (Corbet, 1999). In biogeography research, dragonflies and damselflies are useful bioindicators for assessing environmental changes over long- and short-term scales (O’Neill & Paulson, 2001).
With approximately 6500 known and described species worldwide, Odonata are noticeable and characteristic of freshwater environments (Clausnitzer & Dijkstra, 2005). They are extremely important as bioindicators of the ecological integrity of ecosystems (Corbet, 2004) and in biodiversity studies (Adu et al., 2019; Vick, 2003) due to their high diversity, ease of identification, and conspicuousness. A freshwater environment's Odonata species presence or absence may also be a sign of the health of the body of water (Chovanec & Raab, 1997). There is strong evidence that deforestation has caused the extinction of multiple species of dragonflies locally and nationally in countries where the fauna has been thoroughly investigated (Valiente-Banuet et al., 2015). Since the abundance and composition of freshwater odonata assemblages can vary over time at any one location, it is imperative to provide baseline data regarding current patterns of diversity and distribution (Moore, 1991, 2001). Since Akure became the capital of Ondo State in 1976, it had undergone series of developmental changes in the area of physical landscape, city growth and urban sprawl (Balogun et al., 2011). This not only resulted to depletion of natural resources but also environmental problems such as erosion, agro-chemical runoff and deposition of domestic waste and sewage into water bodies (Balogun et al., 2011). This study seeks to determine the effect of anthropogenic activities on the composition, distribution, and abundance of Odonata of Akure South Local Government Area. The aforementioned data will serve as the foundation for evaluating the long-term impacts of pollution and development on freshwater ecosystems in the millennium city, and they may also be utilized as a first step for their conservation.
Methods
Study area
The study site is located within Akure Southwestern Area Akure, in Ondo State Nigeria (Fig. 1). It has a coordinate of latitude 7.25°N and longitude 5.19°E. The climatic conditions attributed to the site are: high temperatures and high humidity with two distinct seasons, namely wet and dry seasons. The wet season lasts for about eight months (March to October) with an annual rainfall of about 1524 mm. Annual temperature ranges between 28 and 31 °C with a mean annual relative humidity of about 80%. The major rivers in the area are; the Ala River, Elegbin River, and Afo River (Akinseye, 2006). The inhabitants of the Ala River predominantly involved in farming and other artisanal activities.
Two locations were selected (the Ala River area and the Afo River area) based on the presence of waterbodies and the vegetation architecture. Four stations were also selected in the Ala River area namely: (the Federal University of Technology Area (FUTA), Industrial Layout (I.L), LEO, and Ijapo Estate Akure (Ijapo)) while three stations were also selected at the Afo River area. These are: (The court of Appeal Estate, Akure (COAE), Ayee Community Oda Road, Akure (Ayee), and Ayee Farmland). The physical description of the locations selected is on Tables 1 and 2.
Adults’ dragonflies and damselflies was collected once a month for 18 months with the aid of sweep net of 70 cm wide orifices. All the encountered dragonflies and damselflies within 500 m of the water bodies was collected, killed by dipping in acetone for a minute and arranged with the wings at the back to prevent it from rumpled and kept inside a labeled triangular envelop. Those caught in tandem was placed together inside the same envelope. The envelopes with the killed and well-arranged insects was then soaked in acetone for a minimum period of 12 h, depending on the size. Hereafter, the soaked specimens was removed from acetone and then air-dried on a tissue paper. Then, each of the specimens was kept in a transparent small nylon bag (2 × 4 cm), sealed and then placed inside a labeled 3 × 5 cm envelop. The specimen inside envelop was then stored in insect boxes. All odonata species collected, was identified to species level using standard identification manuals (Dijkstra & Clausnitzer, 2014; Vick, 2003). Furthermore, all data collected from the study sites were accumulated and analyzed statistically using both inferential and descriptive statistics. The data collected on physicochemical parameters and odonates were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (at p < 0.05) using SPSS version 20 software package. The species richness of the study sites was determined using diversity indices such as Shannon–Wiener’s index, (H`), Margalef’s index, and Evenness index, (E) with the aid of Paleontologist Statistical Software package (PAST) version 3.0.
Results
A total of 2376 adult odonates (comprising 1363 dragonflies and 1013 damselflies) individuals representing 35 species in 6 families were collected from the study sites. Dragonfly has 1367 individuals from 2 families (Gomphidae and Libellulidae) and 26 species (Table 3); while, damselfly has 1013 individuals from 4 families (Calopterygidae, Ceonagrionidae, Chlorocyphidae, and Platycnemididae) and 9 species (Table 4).
Libellulidae are represented in 25 species; while, Gomphidae is made up of just one species. Also, Ceonagrionidae is made up of 5 species; while, Platycnemididae consists of 2 species; the other is constituted of just one species each.
Libellulidae was the dominant family as it accounted for the highest number of individuals with a percentage composition of 57.32%, followed by Coenagrionidae 38.55%; while, Gomphidae was the least having 0.04% (Fig. 2). All the six families reported in this study were recorded at Ayee Farm land; while, Ijapo (with the highest number of individuals (547)) accounted for five families. However, Ayee, Leo and FUTA have the highest abundance of Libellulidae; while, the least is found in Ayee Farmland. Also, COAE, Ijapo and FUTA have the highest abundance of Coenagrionidae; while, Industrial Layout is the site with the least abundance of Coenagrionidae. (Fig. 3).
Trithemis arteriosa was the dominant Anisoptera species in the study as it accounted for 465 individuals while Lestinogomphus minutus, Orthetrum chrysostigma, Orthetrum abboti, Acisoma trifidum, Crocothemis erythraea, Pantala flavescens, and Urothemis assignata were the least represented Anisoptera species in the study area. Ijapo accounted for the highest number of Zygopteran species (373); while, the least is found in Industrial Layout, Ilesa Road. Pseudagrion ‘A’ kersteni is the most frequent Zygopteran in the study site while C. sikassoensis is the least frequent.
Trithemis arteriosa and Orthetrum monardi were significantly lower in Ayee Farm Land than all the sites, also, Pseudagrion ‘A’ kersteni and Ceriagrion glabrum in Industrial Layout, Ilesa Road and FUTA, respectively, are significantly lower than those of other sites. Likewise, Trithemis annulata is significantly lower in Court of Appeal Estate than in other sites and was not collected in Ayee Farm Land at all (Table 5).
In terms of Species diversity, LEO had highest Shannon wiener value (H’ 2.185) followed by FUTA with (H’ 2.185); while, the least values of Shannon were recorded at both I.L (H’ 2.007) and Ayee farmland (H’ 1.932), respectively (Table 6).
Discussion
The impact of human activity on the assemblage and composition of Odonata (Dragonflies and Damselflies) at this site is a significant concern. Human anthropogenic activities and the impact of the inhabitants have negatively affected the status of the environment. This, in turn, has led to the gradual loss of typical tropical rainforest features in the study area. Several studies have reported that the reduction of conservation areas has resulted in the extinction of important organisms, including Odonata (Harabiŝ & Dolnŷ, 2012; Jŭnior et al., 2014; Saha & Gaikwad, 2014; Willigalla & Fartmann, 2012). The differences in composition and diversity in some research sites can be caused by differences in environmental conditions such as vegetation, food sources, and physical and chemical factors at each site (Siregar & Bakti, 2016; Saha et al. 2014; Suhonen et al., 2010).
The dominant of the two families (Libellulidae and Coenagrionidae) in this study were found to be in consonant with the previous studies such as Naik et al. (2017) in India; Adu and Ogbogu (2013) carried out in Aponmu forest; Kemabonta et al., (2016) in Lagos state University; Kemabonta et al. in Akwa Ibom state (2019).
A total of 27 species of Anisoptera were recorded at the study sites. The study site is made up of species that can resist pollution and anthropogenic disturbance. The largest number (14) of Anisoptera species was recorded at three sites (Ayee, Leo, and FUTA), these sites were recipients of municipal waste and aquaculture discharge. Enriched water from urbanization waste also provided a food source for the primary prey of odonates, Chironomus sp. (Diptera: Chironomidae), and nutrients for the weeds. The decomposition of organic matter, for example, fallen leaves and also food waste from residential areas increased soft sediments, which was favorable to this dipteran (Hawtin, 1998). In the presence of dense growth of weeds, the population of dragonflies especially tolerant genera such as Pseudagrion, Trithemis, Palpopleura, and Orthetrum surged at these sites (Abdul et al., 2017, Wazhizatul-Afzan et al., 2006; Hornung & Rice, 2003).
Forest species such as Pantala flavescens, Lestinogomphus minutus, Chlorocypha curta, and Allocnemis which are not typical of the study area, were also captured though in limited number in this study; thus, heterogeneity exhibited by odonates in habitat selection, especially when the best desired habitat is not available cannot be down played (Corbet, 1999).
Several studies have also shown that Libellulidae is resistant to urban pollution and development globally and locally (e.g., Manuel Ferreras-Romero et al. 2009); Villalobos-Jimenez et al. (2016); Kemabonta et al. (2016); and also because they are early recolonizer of restored environment (Corbet, 2004). While Gomphidae is resistant to it (Manuel Ferreras-Romero et al. 2009); Gomphidae, Calopterygidae, and Chlorocyphidae were very limited in abundance because they are sensitive to pollution and urban development, the few represented in the studies are found in site located close to secondary forest, i.e., in the farmland and in areas where some conservation efforts such as re-growth of riparian vegetation, dredging, development of open space, garden, etc., had been put in place.
The last number (8) of Anisopteran was recorded at Ayee farm which was located in farmland exposed to only chemical runoff contaminating the water, this site contains fewer species because the stream around the study area has a small volume of water that almost dry off during the dry season; and also because Anisoptera prefers to roam around in the open space while most zygopterans are shade lovers (Corbet et al., 2004). However, the site is the only site where all the families of Odonata collected are represented and evenness and equitability tests indicated that Oda (evenness E: 0.4931) was the site with the best distribution of Odonata species. Also, it is the site with the most unique species of Odonata such as Lestinogomphus minutus, Allocnemis elongata, Chlorocypha curta.
Nine Zygopteran species were recorded in the study area (Fig. 3). Ijapo which is situated in a housing estate with a clean environment and good waste management system, accounted for the highest number of damselfly (373); while, the least is found in Industrial Layout, Ilesa Road. Damselflies are more pollution and development tolerant than dragonflies (Kemabonta et al., 2016 and Fulan et al., 2008); therefore, the presence of more damselfly than dragonflies in Ijapo is an indication of a disturbed and polluted environment and this may be as resulted of anthropogenic and polluted activities outside the estate as Ala River passed through several polluted sites such as FUTA, Leo, Oke Ogba, etc., before getting to Ijapo estate.
Different diversity indices were used to measure diversity and species richness to address the problems or limitations of a single index (Purvis and Hector, 2000). The statistical study utilizing the diversity indices demonstrated that LEO and FUTA had higher values for both the Shannon wiener and Simpson dominance indices, indicating that, they were both higher in terms of species composition, abundance of species collected, and diversity of species. This is thought to be due to the large number of shading trees. This assertion was also supported by Dijkstra and Lempert, (2003) that, the degree of shade tends to be the main indicator for dragonflies when choosing a forest environment. Its status as the most abundant in odonate assemblages may have been influenced by the mild disturbance level in the forest border environment (Seidu et al., 2017). It can just be a result of being out of human reach and far from a residential area (Kemabonta et al., 2019).
Leo, Futa, and Industrial Layout Ilesa Road were the most urbanized and most affected by urban pollution, others were sites located either in the semi-urban or housing estate with reduced pollution. According to Corbet, 1999, Odonata is divided into two behavioral types viz; eurytopic and stenotypic. The eurytopic Odonata includes those that can withstand pollution and urban development such as Libellulidae and Coenagrionidae while stenotopic are the opposite. Also, urban pollution was associated with increased abundance and dominance of Libellulidae and other taxa but decreased abundance of Gomphidae (Manuel Ferreras-Romero et al., 2009) and overall evenness (Henriques-de-Oliveira et al., 2007). Stenotopic species such as L. minutus, Chlorocypha curta, Pantala flavescens, and Allocnemis elongata, were not represented in Leo, FUTA, and Industrial layout Ilesa Road, thus these sites can be said to be most disturbed and polluted of all the sites.
Conclusion
This study revealed the severe nature of the study area's situation because of the detrimental effects that human disturbances and local residents' behaviors have had on the abundance, distribution, and composition of adult Odonata. Additionally, most Odonata species that was gathered belonged to the eurytopic group, which is capable of surviving in a contaminated environment.
Availability of data and material
All analyzed data involved in this study are included in this manuscript.
References
Abdul, N. H., Rawi Che, SMd., Ahmad, A. H., & Al-Shami, S. A. (2017). Effect of Environmental disturbances on Odonata assemblages along a tropical polluted river. Ekológia (Bratislava), 36(4), 388–402.
Adu, B. W., Amusan, B. O., & Oke, T. O. (2019). Assessment of the water quality and Odonata assemblages in three water bodies in Ilara-Mokin, south-western Nigeria. International Journal of Odonatology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13887890.2019.1593889
Adu, B. W., & Ogbogu, S. S. (2013). Diversity and community structure of dragonflies and damselflies (Insecta: Odonata) in Aponmu Forest South Western Nigeria. International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 3(6), 231–239.
Akinseye, O. (2006). Wetland Protection and its Potential for Disaster Abatement. Unpublish B.tech. Dissertation. Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria. Pp1–16.Corbet, P.S. (1999). Dragonflies: behavior and ecology of Odonata. Cornell University Press.
Balogun, I.A., Adeyewa, D.Z., Balogun, A.A. & Morakinyo, T.E. (2011). Analysis of Urban Expansion and Land Use Changes in Akure, Nigeria, Using Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System (GIS) Techniques. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning 4(9), 533–541. Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/JGRP.
Bybee, S. M., Kalkman, V. J., Erickson, R. J., Frandsen, P. B., Breinholt, J. W., Suvorov, A., Dijkstra, K. B., Cordero-Rivera, A., Skevington, J. H., Abbott, J. C., Sanchez Herrera, M., Lemmon, A. R., Moriarty Lemmon, E., & Ware, J. L. (2021). Phylogeny and classification of Odonata using targeted genomics. MolecularPhylogenetics and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2021.107115
Chovanec, A., & Raab, R. (1997). Dragonflies (Insecta, Odonata) and the ecological status of newly created wetlands—examples for long-term bioindication programs. Limnologica, 27, 381–392.
Clausnitzer, V., & Dijkstra, K. D. B. (2005). The dragonflies (Odonata) of Ethiopia, with notes on the status of endemic taxa and the description of a new species. Entomol Z Stuttgart, 115(3), 117–130.
Corbet, P. S. (1999). Dragonflies: Behavior and ecology of Odonata. Cornell University Press.
Corbet, P. S. (2004). Dragonflies: Behaviour and Ecology of Odonata. Harley Books.
Dijkstra, K-D.B and Clausnitzer, V. (2014). The Dragonflies and Damselflies of East Africa: Hand Book for all odonata from Sudan to Zimbabwe Studies in Afrotropical Zoology. Belgian Royal Museum for Central Africa. 79.
Dijkstra, K. D. B., & Lempert, J. (2003). Odonate assemblages of running water in the Upper Guinean forest. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie, 157, 397–412.
Fulan, J. A., Raimundo, R., & Figueiredo, D. (2008). Habitat characteristics and dragonflies diversity and abundance in the Guadiana River, Eastern of the Alentejo, Portugal. Boletin De La Asociacion Espanola De Entomologia, 5, 327–340.
Harabiŝ, F., & Dolnŷ, A. (2012). Human altered ecosystems: Suitable habitats as well as ecological traps for Dragonflies (Odonata): The matter of scale. Journal Insect Conservation, 16, 121–130.
Hawtin, E. (1998). Chironomid communities about physical habitat. In- G. Bretschko and J. Helesic (Eds.), Advances in river bottom ecology (pp. 175−184). Leiden: Backhuys Publishers.
Henriques-de-Oliveira, C., Baptista, D. F., & Nssimian, J. F. (2007). Sewage input effects on the macroinvertebrate community associated with Typha domingensis Pers in a coastal lagoon in southeastern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 67(1), 73–80.
Hornung, J.P. & Rice C.L. (2003). Odonata and wetland quality in Southern Alberta Canada: A preliminary study. Odonatologica, 32(2), 119−129. http://natuurtijdschriften.nl/record/592431.
Jŭnior, M., Juen, L., & Hamada, N. (2014). Effects of urbanization on stream habitats and associated adult dragonfly and damselfly communities in central Brazilian Amazonia. Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning, 127, 28–40.
Kadoya, T., Suda, S., & Washitani, I. (2004). Dragonfly species richness in man-made ponds: Effects of pond size and pond age on newly established assemblages. Ecological Research, 19, 461–467.
Kemabonta, K.A., Rosemary, E., Babasola, W.A., Sylvester, U.O, Abdussalam, I. & Rhema, U. (2019). Abundance and Distribution of odonates (Dragonflies and Damselflies) in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. Pan African Journal of Life Sciences 33–38.
Kemabonta, K. A., Adu, B. W., & Ohadiwe, A. C. (2016). Impact of human disturbance on the abundance, diversity, and distribution of Odonata at the University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos, Nigeria. Applied Tropical Agriculture, 21(3), 143–150.
Manuel, F., Joaquín, R. & Antonio, R. (2009). Implications of anthropogenic disturbance factors on the odonata assemblage in a Mediterranean fluvial system. International Journal of Odonatology. 12(2) ISSN 1388–7890.
Moore, N. W. (1991). The development of dragonfly communities and the consequences of territorial behaviour: A 27 year study on small ponds of Woodwalton Fen, Cambridgeshire, UK. Odonatologica, 20, 203–231.
Moore, N. W. (2001). Changes in the dragonfly communities at the twenty ponds at Woodwalton Fen, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom, since the study of 1962–1988. Odonatologica, 30, 289–298.
Naik, K.L. & Sayeswara, H.A. (2017). Diversity, occurrence, and abundance of odonates of Tunga River Bank, adjoining fields, and cultivated lands in Shivamogga District of Karnataka, India. Innovare Journals of Science, 5(2) ISSN-2321-5496.
O’Neill, G., & Paulson, D. R. (2001). An annotated list of Odonata collected in Ghana in 1997, a checklist of Ghana Odonata, and comments on West African Odonate biodiversity and biogeography. Odonatologica, 30, 67–86.
Purvis, A., & Hector, A. (2000). Getting the measure of Biodiversity. Nature, 405, 212–219.
Saha, P., & Gaikwad, S. (2014). Diversity and abundance of Odonata in parks and gardens of Pune city. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 22(5), 308–316.
Siregar, A., & Bakti, D. (2016). Diversity and distribution of Odonata in university Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 5, 229–234.
Suhonen, J., Milla, H., Esa, K., Markku, K., Johanna, K., Jouni, P., & Jukka, S. (2010). Local extinction of dragonfly and damselfly populations in low and high-quality habitat patches. Journal of Conservation Biology, 24(4), 1148–1153.
Valiente-Banuet, A., Aizen, M. A., Alcantara, J. M., Arroyo, J., Cocucci, A., Galetti, M., & Zamora, R. (2015). Beyond species loss: The extinction of ecological interactions in a changing world. Functional Ecology, 29(3), 299–307.
Vick, G. S. (2003). Biodiversity assessment of the Odonate Fauna of the Takamanda forest Reserve. Cameroon. SI/MAB, 8(1), 73–82.
Villalobos-Jiménez, G., Dunn, A. M., & Hassall, C. (2016). Dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata) in urban ecosystems: a review. European Journal of Entomology, 113(1), 217–232.
Watanabe, M., Matsu’ura, S. & Fukaya, M. (2007). Changes in distribution and abundance of the endangered damselfly Mortonagrion hirosei Asahina (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae) in a reed community artificially established for its conservation. Springer. Journal of Insect Conservation.
Wazhizatul-Afzan, A., Julia, J., & Amirrudin, A. (2006). Diversity and distribution of dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata) in Sekayu recreational forest, Terengganu. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 1(2), 97–106.
Willigalla, C., & Fartmann, T. (2012). Patterns in the diversity of Dragonflies (Odonata) in cities across central Europe. Europe Journal Entomology, 109(2012), 235–245.
Acknowledgements
The authors want to thank Prof. Adu for his encouragement, and Dr. Koseemani for assistance during the data collection.
Funding
This research work did not receive external funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
BA, AB and EI contributed to the research design and involved in the research. BA and EI collected, and analyzed the data, interpreted the result, and drafted the manuscript. BA reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bakare, A.B., Adu, B.W. & Ehikhamele, E.I. Effects of anthropogenic disturbances on adult Odonata fauna in Akure, south west Nigeria. JoBAZ 85, 56 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41936-024-00412-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41936-024-00412-7


