Skip to main content
The Journal of Basic and Applied Zoology
Download PDF

Larval habitats characterization and population dynamics of Culex mosquitoes in two localities of the Menoua Division, Dschang and Santchou, West Cameroon

The Journal of Basic and Applied Zoology volume 83, Article number: 30 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Choosing an appropriate strategy for mosquito vector control in an eco-climatic facies requires knowledge on vector ecology including population dynamics of species and productivity of the breeding sites. The aim of this study was to characterize Culex mosquitoes breeding places and to determine their population dynamics in two localities (Dschang and Santchou) separated by a forest cliff in the West Region of Cameroon. Field surveys were conducted from November 2019 to June 2020 in Dschang and Santchou. Mosquito breeding sites were georeferenced, and for each breeding site, physical parameters were measured and immature stages were collected. The collected immatures were reared in the laboratory until adult stage. Adult mosquitoes were identified using a stereomicroscope and morphological identification keys.

Results

A total of 44 breeding sites were identified: 24 in Dschang and 20 in Santchou. They were grouped into seven types and were mostly shallow, close to human dwellings, sunny, with organic matters and of anthropogenic nature. A total of 2706 mosquitoes belonging to four genera were identified. Culex genus was the most represented (90.4%) and was made up of Culex pipiens s.l. (61.79%), Culex duttoni (23.17%) and Culex (Culiciomyia) sp. (05.46%). High abundance of Culex species was observed in Santchou (52.71%) compared to Dschang (47.28%), while Dschang (S = 3; H = 0.87; D = 0.54) recorded the greatest diversity compared to Santchou (S = 2; H = 0.23; D = 0.11).

Conclusions

The proliferation and persistence of Culex mosquitoes independently of the breeding sites and localities might be attributable to the poor environmental management which favor the creation mosquito breeding sites. This study highlights the fact that prompt sanitation measures could be undertaken in these two localities to reduce mosquito abundance and the risk of vector-borne diseases.

Background

Mosquitoes threaten the live and livelihood of millions of people worldwide (Boussès et al., 2018; Braaks et al., 2018; Carnevale & Robert, 2009; WHO, 2014) because they can transmit diseases such as malaria, dengue, chikungunya, filariasis, encephalitis, Rift Valley fever, yellow fever and Zika fever (Ikram et al., 2016). According to WHO, mosquito-borne diseases account for about 17% of the total burden of all infectious diseases across the world (WHO, 2014). In Cameroon, several studies have been carried out on Anopheles mosquitoes (Antonio-Nkondjio et al., 2005; Antonio-Nkondjio et al., 2019; Bamou et al., 2018; Djamouko-Djonkam et al., 2019; Mbida et al., 2018; Tchuinkam et al., 2011; 2010), the vectors of human malaria, but little is known about the systematics and ecology of other mosquitoes species including those of the genus Culex. Culex mosquitoes are responsible of high nuisance and painful bites (Nchoutpouen et al., 2019) and are known to transmit several diseases such as lymphatic filariasis, Rift Valley fever, West Nile fever and avian malaria (Al-Ashry et al., 2018; Ikram et al., 2016; Ochieng et al., 2013; Schmid et al., 2017; Viniaker & Lavaud, 2005). These mosquitoes are largely distributed in urban settings of Cameroon (Nchoutpouen et al., 2019; Ngadvou et al., 2020) where previous studies indicated circulation of arboviruses in Culex mosquitoes species (Brottes et al., 1996; Salaun et al., 1969).

Like most of the large agglomerations in the intertropical zone, the cities of Dschang and Santchou are undergoing a rapid demographic growth due to population displacement resulting from social crisis. This results in a proliferation of wastewater collections which constitute potential breeding sites for Culex mosquitoes, which preferentially breed and adapt in permanent and/or semipermanent, organically polluted water collections (Nchoutpouen et al., 2019).

Currently, integrated vectors management is the most recommended strategy for the control of mosquito vectors. Larval source management (LSM) which requires better understanding of the ecology and composition of the local mosquito fauna is an important component of vector control (Mo’awia et al., 2020). Hence, characterization of mosquito larval habitats is a prerequisite to designing any efficient control strategy. To date, little work has been conducted in western Cameroon on Culex species and their larval habitats.

The current study was carried out to identify and characterize Culex mosquitoes breeding places and to determine their population dynamics in the western highlands (Dschang) and in the “Mbô” plain (Santchou). The cliff that separates Dschang and Santchou would be an example of an isolation barrier that would make it possible to assess the evolution of the specific richness of mosquitoes within the same region at different altitudes.

Methods

Study sites

This study was carried out from November 2019 to June 2020 (except in May) in two localities of the Menoua Division in the West Region of Cameroon, namely Dschang (N 05° 26.522, E 010° 03.153) in the western highlands (located at 1400 m of altitude) and Santchou (N 05° 16.945, E 009° 58.647) in the Mbô plain (located at 700 m of altitude) (Fig. 1), both separated by a forest cliff. Additional differences between the two sites are depicted in Table 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map showing the study sites Dschang and Santchou with the surveyed breeding sites

Full size image
Table 1 Main characteristics of the study sites (PDCD, 2011; PDCS, 2015)
Full size table

Water collections, large or small, artificial or natural, favorable to the development of immature stages of mosquitoes (i.e., eggs, larvae, pupae) were surveyed monthly. Only water collections with Culex larvae were considered. Culex breeding sites were georeferenced using a Garmin eTrex 10 Handheld GPS (Global Position System) and revisited monthly for larval collection during both rainy and dry seasons to assess the effect of seasons on mosquito presence and distribution (Fig. 1).

Physical characterization of breeding sites and collection of Culex immature stages

Mosquito breeding sites were characterized according to seven criteria: (a) type of breeding sites (ponds, tires, swamps, streams, etc.), (b) vegetation (absent/present), (c) distance to the nearest human habitation, (d) water quality (clear or trouble), (e) depth of breeding site, (f) water movement (current/stagnant), (g) presence/absence of organic matter, and (h) presence/absence of other Culicidae larvae. Eggs, larvae and nymphs of Culex mosquitoes were collected in each breeding site of each locality using the “Dipping” technique (Service, 1993). The number of dips varied according to the size of the breeding site, the quantity of water and the presence of larvae. The collected immature stages were stored in several plastic bottles (of at least 1 L of volume) labeled and then transported to the VBID-RUBAE (Vector Borne Diseases Laboratory of the Research Unit of Biology and Applied Ecology) of the University of Dschang. They were reared to adult stage in the insectary under standard laboratory conditions (27–28°C temperature; 70–80% hygrometry) before identification.

Rearing of immature stages and identification of adult mosquitoes

Immature stages collected at the different sampling sites were transferred to labeled rearing trays. Larvae were fed with MosquiFood® as described by Tchuinkam et al. (2011), and nymphs were introduced into cardboard boxes covered with mosquito nets until adult emergence. Adult mosquitoes were later knocked down in the refrigerator (for about 15 min) and identified under a binocular magnifying glass using identification keys of Jupp (1996) and Edwards (1941).

Data analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using R software version 4.0.3 (R version 4.0.3 2020). A Mann–Whitney test was used to compare the abundance and richness of Culex mosquitoes across localities and seasons. Culex abundance according to water quality, presence/absence of vegetation, water movement, presence/absence of organic matter and presence/absence of other Culicidae larvae were assessed using a Mann–Whitney test. A Kruskal–Wallis test was used to assess Culex abundance according to sunshine (sunny, semi-shaded, shady). Spearman correlation was used to compare the abundance of Culex according to the depth of breeding site and the distance of the breeding site from human dwellings. For all analyses, the differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.

Results

Typology and distribution of breeding sites in Dschang and Santchou

A total of 44 breeding sites were identified and characterized during the field survey, with 24 sites found in Dschang and 20 in Santchou. They were grouped into seven categories: gutters (A), pools (B), tires (C), metallic containers (D), plastic containers (E and G), swamps (F) and wells (H) (Fig. 2). Overall, gutters were the most frequent breeding habitats (43.2%) followed by tires (27.3%). More specifically, in Dschang, tires and gutters were the most prevalent breeding sites (37.5% and 33.3%, respectively), while in Santchou the most encountered breeding sites were gutters and pools (55% and 20%, respectively). Wells were less prevalent in both sites (4.2% in Dschang and 5% in Santchou) (Table 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Breeding sites found in Dschang and Santchou

Full size image
Table 2 Distribution of breeding sites in Dschang and Santchou
Full size table

Monthly distribution of breeding sites in Dschang and Santchou

Among the seven categories of breeding sites identified, the greatest number (six breeding sites) was recorded in November (at the end of the rainy season) in Dschang (Fig. 3). The months of January and February (long dry season) recorded only one type of breeding habitats (gutters), while the months of December, March and June (rainy season) recorded two types of breeding habitats (Fig. 3). Gutters were the most encountered and colonized by Culex mosquitoes and were found in six months out of the seven months of collection, especially in June.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Monthly variation of Culex breeding sites in Dschang and Santchou

Full size image

An irregularity of the breeding sites according to months was observed in Santchou (Fig. 3). With the exception of the months of January and March (marked by the presence of only one type of habitats (gutters)), all other months recorded two types of breeding habitats, all different from 1 month to the next. Pools and gutters were the most colonized, especially in May and December, respectively.

Physical characteristics of Culex breeding habitats in Dschang and Santchou

Of the 24 breeding sites found in Dschang, 43.97% had only Culex larvae, while 56.02% were considered as mixed (presence of other larvae of Culicidae) (Table 3). On the other hand, sunny habitats contained a much greater abundance of mosquitoes (51.68%) compared to the semi-shaded and shaded habitats. In addition, mosquitoes preferred stagnant water (97.76%), without vegetation (75.28%) with a depth greater than 10 cm (72.08%). However, no significant difference of the abundance according to the different physical characteristics was observed (p > 0.05).

Table 3 Variation of Culex mosquito abundance according to the physical characteristics of breeding habitats in Dschang
Full size table

Of the 20 breeding sites found in Santchou, 46.21% consisted solely of Culex larvae, while 53.78% contained larvae of other Culicidae. Sunny breeding sites (66.04%) represented the most suitable places for Culex larvae development and appeared trouble (69.37%) with vegetation (60.23%) (Table 4). However, no significant difference of the abundance according to the different physical characteristics was observed (p > 0.05), except for the depth which significantly influenced mosquito abundance (p = 0.04575) in Santchou.

Table 4 Variation of Culex mosquito abundance according to the physical characteristics of breeding habitats in Santchou
Full size table

Abundance and richness of Culex mosquitoes in Dschang and Santchou

A total of 2706 mosquitoes belonging to four genera (Aedes, Anopheles, Culex and Lutzia) and two subfamilies (Anophelinae and Culicinae) were collected in the two localities. Culex genus was the most abundant and represented 90.4% of the total mosquitoes collected, while Aedes spp., Anopheles spp. and Lutzia tigripes accounted for less than 10% of the mosquitoes collected. Species of the Culex pipiens s.l. were the most prevalent, representing 61.79% of the total samples followed by Culex duttoni (23.17%) and Culex (Culiciomyia) sp. (05.46%). Culex mosquito abundance was higher in Santchou (n = 1290–52.72%) compared to Dschang (n = 1157–47.28%), while species richness and diversity were higher in Dschang (S = 3; H = 0.87, D = 0.54) compared to Santchou (S = 2; H = 0.23, D = 0.11) (Table 5). However, no significant difference in the abundance according to the sites was observed (p = 0.8048). This was not the case with species richness which significantly varied across sites (p = 0.0027).

Table 5 Abundance and diversity of Culex mosquitoes in Dschang and Santchou
Full size table

Figure 4 allows to appreciate species richness in both localities. It appears that the city of Dschang was richer in Culex mosquito species compared to Santchou.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Culex rarefaction curve in Dschang and Santchou

Full size image

Mosquito abundance in Dschang was higher during the rainy season (n = 643) compared to the dry season (n = 514), while the same species richness (S = 3) was observed in both seasons (Fig. 5). However, no significant difference in the abundance (p = 1) and species richness (p = 0.4232) across seasons was observed in Dschang.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Abundance and species richness of Culex per season in Dschang and Santchou

Full size image

In Santchou, the abundance of Culex was higher in the dry (n = 694) than in the rainy season (n = 596). Species richness was also greater during the dry season (S = 2) compared to the rainy season (S = 1) (Fig. 5). However, no significant difference in the abundance (p = 1) and species richness (p = 0.4232) across seasons was observed.

Discussion

The findings of this study revealed that artificial (man-made) breeding sites such as gutters and tires were the most abundant and frequent in both localities. The abundance of these two types of larval habitats could be explained by intensive human activities (economic and industrial), a poorly controlled urbanization and lack of sanitation around habitations in these localities. These results are in accordance with those obtained by Koumba et al. (2018) in agricultural areas in Gabon, Mbida et al. (2018) in the surroundings of Wouri in the Cameroon coast, and Benhissen et al. (2017) in the region of Biskra in Algeria who found that human activities and poor environmental management impact the proliferation of mosquito breeding sites. However, in a different ecosystem (the case of the forest for example), tree holes, bamboo hollows and stagnant water created by public work machines (caterpillars) represent development sites of Culex mosquitoes (Mayi et al., 2019). Additional research on the physicochemical characteristics of the different Culex breeding sites encountered should be carried out.

High densities of Culex spp. were found in turbid, stagnant and sunny water bodies, rich in organic matters in Dschang and Santchou. These results are similar to those of Berchi et al. (2012) in Algeria who indicated that Culex larvae were more frequently encountered in turbid water containing organic matter because this provides a substantial nutrient supply for their development and reduces competition rates (Souza et al., 2019). Previous studies conducted in Cameroon by Nchoutpouen et al. (2019) in Yaoundé, Ngadvou et al. (2020) in Ngaoundéré, Mbida et al. (2018) in Douala and Saotoing et al. (2014) in Maroua also revealed that mosquitoes of this genus prefer breeding sites with turbid and more or less polluted water. According to Hassaine (2002), the characters clear/turbid, sunny/shaded nature of the water in most breeding sites, added to the fact that they are poor or rich in dissolved organic matter seem to contribute largely to the proliferation of certain species. However, no significant difference in abundance based on different characteristics of immature stages was observed in Dschang and Santchou except for the depth, which significantly influenced mosquito abundance in Santchou.

Although considered as a secondary ecological factor, depth can provide an important indication on the field. It is assessed from two categories of larval habitat: deep larval habitat, in this case the depth is greater than 50 cm, and shallow larval habitat (less than 50 cm) (Hassaine, 2002). In general, the majority of Culicidae rarely frequent deep breeding sites. High densities of Culex spp. were found in shallow and sunny water bodies in Dschang and Santchou. This could be explained by the fact that, in these habitats, water temperature rises rapidly due to its exposure to sun, which accelerates the speed of larval development. In fact, eggs hatch faster when they are subjected to higher temperatures (Hassaine, 2002). Similar results on the variation in abundance according to depth were reported in An. labranchiae by Tabbabi et al. (2015).

It is known that the density of mosquito larvae in breeding sites is highly influenced by other factors such as vegetation and the surrounding habitats. In Dschang, the highest density (75%) of Culex larvae was found in breeding sites without vegetation and this is because the presence of such vegetation in water body may cause barriers for the oviposition of gravid females, shadowing the water surface as well as microbial growth. It is also very important to mention that 52% of mosquitoes in Dschang were found at a distance less than 10 m from human dwellings. The occurrence of larval habitats with a high density of mosquito larvae around houses might represent a risk of future transmission of Culex-borne diseases among the population of Dschang especially.

The knowledge of the seasonal abundance of mosquitoes is of importance in predicting the period of maximum risk of disease transmission and for carrying out an effective control program (Ashry et al., 2018). The high abundance recorded during the rainy season in Dschang shows that monthly mosquito productivity was strongly influenced by rainfall (this was not the case in Santchou). Indeed, rain offers more possibilities in the choice of breeding sites for different Culicidian species in terms of quality and quantity. These results corroborate those by Nchoutpouen et al. (2019) in Yaoundé where the abundance of Culex increased with rains. They are also similar to those of Saotoing et al. (2014) in Maroua. According to these authors, mosquitoes are present throughout the year with a greater abundance at the start and the end of the rainy season. However, in order to better appreciate mosquito dynamics across seasons, an extension of the collection period throughout the year is important.

A greater abundance of mosquitoes was observed in Santchou compared to Dschang. It is known that areas of low altitude are generally subjected to higher temperatures than those of high altitudes. However, temperature and precipitation have a direct influence on the biology of vectors and the pathogens they transmit (Carnevale & Robert, 2009). In fact, when temperature rises, female mosquitoes digest the blood meal more quickly and therefore lay eggs more frequently, which increases the chances of encountering a high density of larvae in the breeding sites. In addition, this can increase water temperature which favors larval development (Hassaine, 2002). The town of Santchou, located at a low altitude, would therefore offer more possibilities for egg-laying by female mosquitoes compared to the town of Dschang. On the other hand, this result could also be explained by the fact that in some breeding sites, the amount of water collected was greater than in others, and that egg rafts were also collected in addition to the larvae.

Overall, species richness was low because only three Culex species were identified, namely Culex pipiens s.l, Culex duttoni and Culex (Culiciomyia) spp. This could be explained by the use of only one collection method (the “dipping” or ladle stroke). Indeed, several collection methods are important to increase the chances of having greater diversity. Carlson et al. (2015) showed that at least five collection methods are necessary to have a great diversity of mosquitoes in different habitats. Dschang was more diverse than Santchou in terms of mosquito richness. Culex pipiens s.l. and Culex (Culiciomyia) sp. were found in both localities, while Cx. duttoni was only found in Dschang. The absence of Culex duttoni in Santchou could be explained by the fact that the breeding sites of Santchou did not present all the conditions required and favorable for their development. Based on studies by Mayi et al. (2019, 2020) and Nchoutpouen et al. (2019), the presence of Culicinae species and their abundance could also vary depending on the type of landscape, altitude and/or the presence/absence of vegetation cover. Indeed, areas found at high altitude generally have a greater species richness than those found at low altitude (Stevens, 1992). These results are contrary with the work by Tchuinkam et al. (2010) on the bionomic of Anopheles following an altitudinal transect in the region of West Cameroon, where the diversity of Anopheles species decreased from areas of low altitudes to those of high altitudes. A similar study at a much higher altitude and on the forest cliff itself should be carried out in order to assess the evolution of Culex mosquitoes following an altitudinal transect in the West Region of Cameroon.

Conclusions

A great diversity of Culex breeding sites were encountered in both localities of which mostly were shallow, close to human dwellings, sunny, trouble, loaded with organic matter and of an anthropogenic nature. While Santchou recorded the greatest abundance of Culex, Dschang was found to be more diverse in terms of species richness, suggesting a possible effect of the altitudinal differences of the two localities on Culex mosquitoes. The proliferation of Culex mosquitoes in the two localities would be attributable to the unsanitary conditions and to human activities which create and ensure the maintenance of breeding sites for mosquitoes; this could increase the risk of vector-borne diseases to the human population of Dschang and Santchou. A sustainable public health campaign on vector management and control should therefore be intensified in these cities.

Availability of data and materials

Data generated during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

Cx:

Culex

H:

Shannon index

D:

Simpson index

GPS:

Global Positioning System

S:

Species richness

Sp:

Species

References

  • Antonio-Nkondjio, C., Ndo, C., Njiokou, F., Bigoga, J., Awono-Ambene, P., Etang, J., Ekobo, A., & Wondji, C. (2019). Review of malaria situation in Cameroon: Technical viewpoint on challenges and prospects for disease elimination. Parasites and Vectors, 12, 501. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3753-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Antonio-Nkondjio, C., Simard, F., Awono-Ambene, P., Ngassam, P., Toto, J., Tchuinkam, T., & Fontenille, D. (2005). Malaria vectors and urbanization in the equatorial forest Region of South Cameroon. Transaction of Royal Society of Tropical Medecine and Hygiene, 99, 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trstmh.2004.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashry, H., Kenawy, M., & Shobrak, M. (2018). Ecological aspects of the bancroftian filariasis vectors, Culex pipiens and Cx. quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Hail, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Mosquito Research, 5(1), 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamou, R., Mbakop, R., Kopya, E., Ndo, C., Awono-Ambene, P., Tchuinkam, T., Rono, M., Mwangangi, J., & Antonio-Nkondjio, C. (2018). Changes in malaria vector bionomics and transmission patterns in the equatorial forest region of Cameroon between 2000 and 2017. Parasites & Vectors, 11, 464. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-3049-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benhissen, S., Habbachi, W., & Ouakid, M. (2017). BiodiversitĂ© and rĂ©partition des moustiques (Diptera: Culicidae) dans les oasis de la RĂ©gion de Biskra (Sud-Est algĂ©rien). Algerian journal of Arid Environment, 7(1), 96–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berchi, S., Aouati, A., & Louadi, K. (2012). Typology of favourable biotopes to the larval development of Culex pipiens L. 1758. (Diptera-Culicidae), source of nuisance at constantine (Algeria). Ecologia Mediterranea, 38(2), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.3406/ecmed.2012.1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boussès, P., Le Goff, G., & Robert, V. (2018). Inventory of the mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) of the islands of southwestern India Ocean, Madagascar excluded- a critical review. Annales de la SociĂ©tĂ© Entomologique de France, 54, 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379271.2018.1429951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braack, L., Almeida, A., Cornel, A., Swanepoel, R., & Jager, C. (2018). Mosquito-borne arboviruses of African origin: Review of key viruses and vectors. Parasites & Vectors, 11, 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2559-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brottes, H., Rickenbach, A., Brès, P., SalaĂĽn, J., & Ferrara, L. (1996). Arboviruses in the Cameroon. Isolation from mosquitoes. Bulletin of World Health Organisation, 35, 811–825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, S., Walther, E., Trout-Fryxell, R., Staley, S., Tell, L., Sehgal, R., Barker, C., & Cornel, A. (2015). Identifying avian malaria vectors: Sampling methods influence outcomes. Parasites & Vectors, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0969-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnevale, P., & Robert, V. (2009). Les anophèles: Biologie, transmission du plasmodium et lutte anti-vectorielle, Marseille. IRD edition, p. 39i, ISBN 978-2-7099-1662-2.

  • Djamouko-Djonkam, L., Mounchili-Ndam, S., Kala-Chouakeu, N., Nana-Ndjangwo, S., Kopya, E., Sonhafouo-Chiana, N., Talipouo, A., Ngadjeu, C., Doumbe-Belisse, P., Bamou, R., Toto, J., Tchuinkam, T., Wondji, C., & Antonio-Nkondjio, C. (2019). Spatial distribution of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato larvae in the urban environment of YaoundĂ©, Cameroon. Infectious Diseases of Poverty, 8, 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-019-0597-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, F. (1941). Mosquitoes of the Ethiopian region. Culicinae adults and pupae Culex (Culex). British Museum (Natural History).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassaine, K. (2002). BiogĂ©ographie et biotypologie des Culicidae (Diptera : Nematocera) de l’Afrique mĂ©diterranĂ©enne. BioĂ©cologie des espèces les plus vulnĂ©rantes (Aedes caspius, Aedes detritus, Aedes mariae et Culex pipiens) de la rĂ©gion occidentale algĂ©rienne. ThĂ©se de Doctorat es Sciences, UniviversitĂ© de Tlemcen, p. 191.

  • Ikram, M., Abdelkader, C., Alemad, A., Arwa, A., Asmaa, B., Mohammed, H., Driss, B., & Khadija. (2016). Etude Ă©cologique et entomlogique des Culicides larvaires des gĂ®tes de la province de Kenita (Maroc). European Scientific Journal, 12(32), 1857–7881. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n32p398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jupp, P. (1996). Mosquitoes of southern Africa: Culicinae and toxorhynchitinae hartebees spoort (South Africa). Ekogilde Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koumba, A., Koumba, C., Nguema, R., Djogbenou, L., Obame, O., Koffivi, K., Comlan, P., M’batchi, B., & Mavoungou, F. (2018). Distribution spatiale et saisonnière des gĂ®tes larvaires des moustiques dans les espaces agricoles de la zone de Mouila Gabon. International Journal of Biology and Chemical Sciences, 12(4), 1754–1769. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.12i4.19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayi, M., Bamou, R., Djiappi-Tchamen, B., Albin, F., Claire, L., Walker, T., Antonio-Nkondjio, C., Cornel, A., & Tchuinkam, T. (2020). Habitat and seasonality affect mosquito community composition in the west region of Cameroon. Insect, 312(11), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11050312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayi, M., Foncha, D., Kowo, C., Tchuinkam, T., Brisco, K., Anong, D., Ravinder, S., & Cornel, A. (2019). Impact of deforestation on the abundance, diversity, and richness of Culex mosquitoes, in a Southwest Cameroon tropical rainforest. Journal of Vector Ecology, 44(2), 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvec.12359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mbida, A., Ntonga, P., Awono-ambene, P., Simo, W., Talipouo, A., Tchoffo, R., Dongmo, A., Lehman, A., & Mimpfoundi, R. (2018). Contribution Ă  la gestion durable du bassin versant du Wouri par une Ă©tude de la rĂ©partition de sa faune culicidienne (littoral-Cameroun). Revue D’ecologie (terre Et Vie), 73(4), 550–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mo’awia, M., Nawaf, D., Mohammed, A., Saud, S., Nawaf, A., & Adnan, A. (2020). Characterization and distribution of larval habitats of Culex pipiens complex (diptera: culicidae) vectors of west Nile virus in Tabuk town, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Mosquito Research, 7(5), 60–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nchoutpouen, E., Talipouo, A., Djiappi-Tchamen, B., Djamouko-Djonkam, L., Kopya, E., Ngadjeu, C., Doumbe, P., Awono-AmbĂ©nĂ©, P., Kekeunou, S., Wondji, C., & Antonio-Nkondjio, C. (2019). Culex species diversity, susceptibility to insecticides and role as potential vector of Lymphatic filariasis in the city of YaoundĂ© Cameroon. Plos Neglected Tropical Diseases, 13(4), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngadvou, D., Younoussa, L., Yonki, B., Okechukwu, C., Nchiwan, N., & Esimone. (2020). Diversity and spatiotemporal distribution of mosquito species in Ngaoundere Cameroon. International Journal of Mosquito Research, 7(3), 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochieng, C., Lutomiah, J., Makio, A., Koka, H., Chepkorir, E., Yalwala, S., Mutisya, J., Musila, L., Khamadi, S., & Richardson, J. (2013). Mosquito-borne arbovirus surveillance at selected sites in diverse ecological zones of Kenya, 2007–2012. Virology Journal, 10, 140. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-10-140

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • PDCD. (2011). Plan de developpement communal de la ville de Dschang.

  • PDCS. (2015). Plan de developpement communal de la ville de Santchou.

  • R version 4.0.3 (2020-10-10). Copyright (C) 2020 The R foundation for statistical computing. Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit).

  • SalaĂĽn, J., Rickenbach, A., Brès, P., Brottes, H., Germain, M., Eouzan, J., & Ferrara, L. (1969). Arboviruses isolated from mosquitoes in Cameroon. Bulletin of World Health Organisation, 41, 233–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saotoing, P., Tchuenguem, F., & NlĂ´ga, A. (2014). EnquĂŞte entomologique sur la faune culicidienne de la ville de Maroua, rĂ©gion de l’ExtrĂŞme-Nord Cameroun. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 9(1), 438–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, S., Dinkel, A., Mackenstedt, U., Luciano, M., & Fano. (2017). Avian malaria on Madagascar: Bird host and pupative vector mosquitoes of different plasmodium lineages. Parasites & Vectors, 10, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1939-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Service, M. (1993). Mosquito ecology: Field sampling methods, vector biology and control. London Applied science publish.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Souza, R., Virginio, F., Riback, T., Suesdek, L., Barufi, J., & Genta, F. (2019). Microorganism-based larval diets affect mosquito development, size and nutritional reserves in the yellow fever mosquito aedes aegypti (diptera: culicidae). Frontiers in Physiology, 10. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6465640.

  • Stevens, G. (1992). The elevational gradient in altitudinal range: An extention of Rapoport’s latitudinal rule to altitude. American Naturalist, 140, 893–911. https://doi.org/10.1086/285447

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tabbabi, A., Bousses, P., Rhim, A., Brengues, C., Daaboub, J., Nissaf, B., Fontenille, D., Bouratbine, A., Simard, F., & Aoun, K. (2015). Larval habitats characterization and species composition of anopheles mosquitoes in Tunisia, with particular attention to anopheles maculipennis complex. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 92(3), 653–659. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.14-0513

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tchuinkam, T., Mpoame, M., Make-Mveinhya, B., Simard, F., LĂ©lĂ©-Defo, E., ZĂ©bazĂ©-Togouet, S., Tateng-Ngouateu, A., Awono-AmbĂ©nĂ©, P., Antonio-Nkondjio, C., NjinĂ©, T., & Fontenille, D. (2011). Optimization of breeding output for larval stage of anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae): Prospects for the creation and maintenance of laboratory colony from wild isolates. Bulletin of Entomological Reseach, 101, 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485310000349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tchuinkam, T., Simard, F., LĂ©lĂ©-Defo, E., TĂ©nĂ©-Fossog, B., Tateng-Ngouateu, A., AntonioNkondjio, C., Mpoame, M., Toto, J., NjinĂ©, T., Fontenille, D., & Awono-AmbĂ©nĂ©, P. (2010). Bionomics of Anopheline species and malaria transmission dynamics along altitudinal transect in Western Cameroon. Biomed Central Infectious Diseases, 10, 119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viniaker, H., & Lavaud, F. (2005). Allergie aux piqĂ»res de moustiques. Revue Française d’allergologie et d’immunologie clinique, 45, 620–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.allerg.2005.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2014). A global brief on vector-borne diseases. World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the members of VBID-RUBAE from the University of Dschang for their assistance during field work and the populations of Dschang and Santchou for their collaborations.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vector Borne Diseases Laboratory of the Research Unit of Biology and Applied Ecology (VBID-RUBAE), Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Science of the University of Dschang, P.O. Box 067, Dschang, Cameroon

    Joel Djoufounna, Marie Paul Audrey Mayi, Roland Bamou, Laura Gilberine Ningahi, Falone Ornela Magatsing, Borel Djiappi-Tchamen, Landre Djamouko-Djonkam & Timoléon Tchuinkam

  2. Laboratoire de Recherche sur le Paludisme, Organisation de Coordination pour la lutte Contre les Endémies en Afrique Centrale (OCEAC), P.O. Box 288, Yaoundé, Cameroon

    Roland Bamou, Borel Djiappi-Tchamen, Landre Djamouko-Djonkam & Christophe Antonio-Nkondjio

Authors
  1. Joel Djoufounna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marie Paul Audrey Mayi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Roland Bamou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Laura Gilberine Ningahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Falone Ornela Magatsing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Borel Djiappi-Tchamen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Landre Djamouko-Djonkam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Christophe Antonio-Nkondjio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Timoléon Tchuinkam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DJ, MMPA, NLG, MFO and DTB carried out the field and laboratory studies. DJ, MMPA, BR, ANC and TT designed and supervised the study. MMPA carried out the data analysis. DJ wrote the first manuscript draft. ANC, TT, BR, DTB, DDL and MMPA critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie Paul Audrey Mayi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Djoufounna, J., Mayi, M.P.A., Bamou, R. et al. Larval habitats characterization and population dynamics of Culex mosquitoes in two localities of the Menoua Division, Dschang and Santchou, West Cameroon. JoBAZ 83, 30 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41936-022-00290-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41936-022-00290-x

Keywords