- Open Access
The effect of cladoceran, Daphnia magna, on the growth and pupation of Aedes aegypti L. mosquito larvae
The Journal of Basic and Applied Zoology volume 83, Article number: 36 (2022)
Dengue and chikungunya are two mosquito-borne viruses transmitted by the mosquito, Aedes aegypti, and are responsible for great public health concerns in India. The present study tested the effect of Daphnia magna, a freshwater cladoceran, on the growth and pupation of Ae. aegypti larvae.
Ae. aegypti third instar larvae and adult, D. magna, were introduced in the ratios 1:1, 1:2 and 1:3 into beakers and placed in an illuminated BOD incubator at a temperature of 26 ± 1 °C. The delay in the duration of larval stages (the time taken from third instar stage until their emergence as adults) was measured. The emergence of adults was delayed for 3–4 days in the treatments where the ratio of D. magna was thrice the number of Ae. aegypti larvae. The L3 larval stage was found to be more prone to mortality than later instars, with 51.66% larval mortality. The sex ratio of males to females emerged was only 5:5 in the 1:3 ratio. Body size of both males and females was significantly reduced in all the treatment sets in the ratios: 1:1, 1:2 and 1:3 when compared with the control set. Longevity of adult was also reduced from 8–15 to 4–7 days in the case of males, and in the case of females it was reduced from 14–25 to 5–9 days in the treatment set when Daphnia was introduced thrice the number of Aedes larvae.
Our study provides evidence that D. magna affects the growth and pupation of Aedes larvae and consequentially the life history parameters that affect the fitness of the population.
Mosquitoes are responsible for transmitting ailments approximately to 700 million people every year (Kessler & Guerin, 2008; Taubes, 2000). Globally, there were 96 million instances of dengue infections and India alone accounted 34% (22–24 million) in 2010. Dengue is endemic in all states and union territories (UTs) of India, and a total of 99, 913 dengue cases and 220 deaths in 2016 were reported in 35 states and UTs of India as reported by WHO (2017). Mosquitoes are a vital part in the study of disease transmission as they cause lethal ailments (Shinde, 2010). This aggravating situation of rising cases focuses towards the wasteful mosquito control operations. Aedes aegypti transmits the greater part of dengue infections, and vector control is the principal technique for combating this ailment for which no vaccine or therapeutant at this moment exists (Phillips, 2008). Biotic interaction such as competition is known to affect mosquito larval development. Competitors such as crustaceans are common in all kinds of pond waters and can quickly colonize new biotopes (Williams, 2006). As filter feeders, they consume similar food resources as of mosquito larvae which are also filter feeders. Williams (2006) found that crustaceans were dominated by cladocera (Daphnia spp.), common in all kinds of freshwater waterbodies. Zooplankton like cladocerans can fulfil all the requirements necessary for the bio-control of mosquitoes as they can easily adapt to the breeding sites of mosquitoes, their close interaction with mosquito larval population and widespread occurrence in fields. These characters of cladocerans make them potential contenders against mosquitoes as suggested by Kumar and Hwang (2006). According to Duquesne et al. (2011), in semifield conditions, D. magna strongly affected the population of Culex pipiens and Anopheles quadrimaculatus by suppressing their oviposition, increasing time to pupation and reducing total abundance. The effect of competition and predation depends on environmental factors and presence of other species; for instance, the presence of alternate prey lowers the predation pressure on one species and on the other hand the presence of high food resources changes the competitive effect as reported by Bevins (2007). Therefore, the objective of the present study was aimed at checking the influence of the crustacean D. magna on Ae. aegypti L. mosquito population. There is still need for more information to depict the natural habitats which allows the control of mosquitoes via predators/competitors by natural means.
Adult Daphnia, especially females, were taken from a pure laboratory reared culture and introduced into beakers with 300 ml of dechlorinated water. Twenty third instar wild-collected Aedes larvae (from water samples) and D. magna isolated from pure culture were introduced in the ratio of 1:0, 1:1, 1:2 and 1:3 (20:0, 20:20, 20:40 and 20:60). Food was given on the day of the start of the experiment, i.e. 0 day, and on the 4th day of the experiment (5 mg yeast/larva). Three replicates were performed for each combination of mosquito larvae and cladocerans. Three replicates of control set (without Daphnia) were run simultaneously. All beakers were placed in an illuminated BOD incubator kept at a temperature of 26 ± 1 °C. The number of live larvae was counted every 24 h. The time taken for the development (from larva to pupa and from pupa to adult) of Aedes larvae in treated and control sets was calculated. Other parameters such as emerged adult body size, male-to-female ratio and adult longevity were also recorded.
Total mortality per container was scored as per the following formula:
Data were statistically analysed with multivariate analysis of variance by the help of SPSS statistical software version 16.
The effect of Daphnia magna on developmental period of Aedes aegypti larvae
The durations of larval stages in the control treatments (having Ae. aegypti larvae only): L3–L4, L4 to pupa and pupa to adult, were 2.83 ± 0.84, 4.00 ± 1.00 and 1.73 ± 0.25 days, respectively. The overall duration recorded was 6.5–11.0 days. It was observed that when Ae. aegypti larvae were kept along with D. magna in the ratios: 1:1, 1:2 and 1:3, a significant delay in the developmental period of larval stages was recorded (Wilk’s ˄ = 0.00, F15,11 = 11.75, p < 0.001) (Table 1). The time taken for the conversion of L3 larval stage to L4 stage was 2–4 days in the control set. This time increases as the ratio of D. magna increases (3–4 days, 3–5 days and 4–5 days, respectively). For the L4 stage, the pattern differs from the L3 stage. The control treatment and the ratio 1:1 (D. magna: Ae. aegypti) were similar, 3–5 days. The treatments with 1:2 and 1:3 ratios took longer to complete the L4 stage (4–5 days). The time taken for the conversion of pupal stage to the adult form was 1.5–2 days in control set, and in the 1:1 and 1:2 treatment sets. The duration of the pupal stage was longer in the treatment set with the ratio of 1:3 (2.5–3 days). The overall development was found to take longer in all the cladoceran treatments sets, but it took longest (10.5–13.0 days) in the treatment with the ratio 1:3 (Table 1). The time for conversion of L4–pupa was longer than either of the others in the control group, but was least affected by the cladoceran treatments. It was recorded that with the increasing number of cladocerans in the treatments there was an increase in the duration of each larval developmental stage.
The effect of Daphnia magna on the mortality of later stages of Aedes aegypti larval development
There was no mortality in control group of larvae at any larval stage, and there was mortality in the cladocerans group at all levels and at all larval stages. The mortality rate was higher in the L3 stage than in the other two groups. There was a significant increase in mortality rate (Wilk’s ˄ = 0.00, F15,11 = 11.75, p < 0.001) with average per cent mortality of L3 larval stage being found to be 31.66%, 41.66% and 51.66% in the treatment sets 1:1, 1:2 and 1:3. However, per cent mortality of L4 stage was 6.66%, 16.66% and 16.66%. It was also observed that pupal stages were also prone to mortality when exposed to different ratios: 1:1, 1:2 and 1:3 of D. magna, having average per cent mortality of 16.66%, 16.66% and 15.00%, respectively, which were found to be statistically significant compared to the control sets (Table 2).
The effect of Daphnia magna on the sex ratio of emerged adult Aedes aegypti mosquitoes
100% of larvae emerged as adults, and the sex ratio of male/female recorded was 31:29 in the control set. In the treatment set 1:1, the sex ratio was 18:8 with 43.33% adult emergence. In the treatment set 1:2, 25% of the larvae emerged as adults with a sex ratio of 10:5. However, least adult emergence (16.66%) was recorded in the treated set 1:3, with the sex ratio of 5:5 (Table 3). Similar number of females survived in all three competition treatments (8, 5 and 5), but that the number of males that survived decreased monotonically (18, 10 and 5). The males appear to be affected differently by the competition provided with Daphnia than were the females.
The effect of rearing larvae with Daphnia magna on the wing length of adult Aedes aegypti
Average body length (wing length) of emerged males was 1.88 ± 0.02 mm recorded in the control set ranging from 1.86 to 1.90 mm. A significant difference was recorded in all the treatment sets (Wilk’s ˄ = 0.00, F18,8.9 = 131.74, p < 0.001) with average wing length of 1.60 ± 0.02 mm, 1.68 ± 0.02 mm and 1.59 ± 0.02 mm in the ratios: 1:1, 1:2 and 1:3, respectively, as compared to the control set. In the case of adult females, average wing length was also reduced: 1.76 ± 0.01 mm, 1.82 ± 0.03 mm and 110 1.76 ± 0.01 mm, respectively, as compared to the control set with females having wing lengths of 2.29 ± 0.01 mm (range 2.28–2.30) (Table 4). It is clear that rearing these larvae with D. magna reduces the wing length of both males and females compared to the control group. It was also observed that the larvae reared in the ratio 1:2 group grow larger than those reared in the 1:1 and 1:3 ratio groups.
The effect of rearing mosquito larvae with Daphnia magna on the longevity of adult Aedes aegypti
The life span of both male and female was significantly reduced with increasing ratio of D. magna in the treatment sets (Wilk’s ˄ = 0.003, F12,21 = 8.71, p < 0.001). In the control set, the average adult longevity was found to be 10 ± 4.35 days (males) and 20.33 ± 5.68 days (females). In the case of males, the average longevity was reduced to 8.66 ± 1.52 days, 7.00 ± 2.00 days and 5.33 ± 1.52 days in the respective treated sets. Similarly, the average longevity was reduced to 10.33 ± 1.52 days, 8.33 ± 1.52 days 7.00 ± 2.00 days, respectively in the case of females (Table 5).
Our outcomes demonstrate clear evidence that in a laboratory conducted trial, Aedes larval development, survival and body size and longevity were most affected by increased densities of D. magna. The presence of interspecific competitors limits the amount of food resources, resulting in delayed development and decreased survival of mosquito larvae (Juliano and Reminger 1992). This is consistent with findings from studies that focused only on mosquitoes, which showed that under both laboratory and field conditions, an increasing density of competitors (i.e. intra or interspecific mosquito competitors) is linked to increased mortality of the mosquito species of concern, delayed maturity, reduced adult size and reduced adult longevity (Agnew et al., 2002; Braks et al., 2004; Reiskind & Lounibos, 2009; Renshaw et al., 1993; Teng & Apperson, 2000). D. magna were found to be effective competitors than M. aspericornis which being larger in size resulted in delaying the overall developmental period of Aedes larvae efficiently (Thakur & Kocher, 2020). Yoshika et al. (2012) had also demonstrated that intraspecific competition for food among larvae of Ae. albopictus had a significant reduction on the number of adults that emerged. The sizes of Aedes females were smaller when provided with interspecific competition as reported by Costanzo et al. (2011). Large-bodied mosquitoes may play a more important role in maintenance and amplification of mosquito-borne pathogens than smaller individuals, and a mosquito population with large average body size may have a higher vectorial capacity than a population with small average body size (Nasci, 1986). The size of adults was determined during the aquatic larval stage. Competition among larvae for food influences the size of the pupae and the adults. It was recorded that in the treatment ratio 1:2, the wing size of both male and female mosquitoes was somewhat larger as compared to 1:1 and 1:3 group which might be due to the smaller size of D. magna in the ratio 1:2, thus competing less efficiently with Aedes larvae than the other two groups. Therefore, the size of the adult female affects her success, fitness and ability to transmit diseases (Steinwascher, 2018). Wing length is known to be directly related to the body size in Ae. aegypti as reported by Christophers (1960). Thus, the smaller the wing length, the smaller the body size of mosquito reported. The small-sized Ae. aegypti females exhibited reduced blood feeding success and most likely reduced survival when compared with large adults (Nasci, 1986). The degree of intraspecific competition had a significant effect on adult longevity under low humidity conditions as reported by Reiskind & Lounibos (2009).
The presence of Daphnia magna in containers along with Aedes mosquito larvae resulted in a longer developmental period; a reduction in the rate of adult emergence; a smaller body size of the adult mosquitoes; and a reduced longevity of male and female mosquitoes which affects the life history parameters that could alter the overall Aedes mosquito population.
Availability of data and materials
All data are available in the manuscript.
Agnew, P., Hide, M., Sidobre, C., & Michalakis, Y. (2002). A minimalist approach to the effects of density-dependent competition on insect life-history traits. Ecological Entomology, 27, 396–402.
Bevins, S. N. (2007). Timing of resource input and larval competition between invasive and native container-inhabiting mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Vector Ecology, 32, 252–262.
Braks, M. A. H., Honorio, N. A., Lounibos, L. P., Lourenço-De Oliveira, R., & Juliano, S. A. (2004). Interspecific competition between two invasive species of container mosquitoes, Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae), in Brazil. Annals of the Entomoogical Society of America, 97, 130–139.
Christophers, S. R. (1960). Aedes aegypti the yellow fever mosquito: its life history, bionomics and structure (p. 739). London: Cambridge University Press.
Costanzo, K. S., Muturi, E. J., Lampman, R. L., & Alto, B. W. (2011). The effects of resource type and ratio on competition with Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Medical Entomology, 48(1), 29–38.
Duquesne, S., Kroeger, I., Kutyniok, M., & Liess, M. (2011). The potential of cladocerans as controphic competitors of the mosquito Culex pipiens. Journal of Medical Entomology, 48, 554–560.
Juliano, S. A., & Reminger, L. (1992). The relationship between vulnerability to predation and behavior of larval treehole mosquitoes: Geographic and ontogenetic differences. Oikos, 63, 465.
Kessler, S., & Guerin, M. P. (2008). Responses of Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles stephensi, Aedes aegypti, and Culex pipiens mosquitoes to cool and humid refugium conditions. Journal of Vector Ecology, 33, 145–149.
Kumar, R., & Hwang, J. S. (2006). Larvicial efficiency of aquatic predators: A perspective in mosquito control. Zoological Studies, 45, 447–466.
Nasci, R. S. (1986). The size of emerging and host-seeking Ae. aegypti and the relation of size to blood-feeding success in the field. American Mosquito Control Association, 2, 61–62.
Phillips, M. (2008). Dengue reborn: Widespread resurgence of a resilient vector. Environmental Health Perspectives, 116, 382–388.
Reiskind, M. H., & Lounibos, L. P. (2009). Effects of intraspecific larval competition on adult longevity in the mosquitoes Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Medical Veterinary Entomology, 23, 62–68.
Renshaw, M., Service, M. W., & Birley, M. H. (1993). Density dependent regulation of Aedes cantans (Diptera: Culicidae) in natural and artificial populations. Ecological Entomology, 18, 223–233.
Shinde, L. (2010). Distribution and diversity of mosquito from Jalna urban (M.S.) India. Deccan Current Science, 3(1), 73–81.
Steinwascher, K. (2018). Competition among Aedes aegypti larvae. PLoS ONE, 13, e0202455.
Taubes, G. (2000). Searching for a parasite weak spot Science. Vaccines, 290, 434–437.
Teng, H. J., & Apperson, C. S. (2000). Development and survival of immature Aedes albopictus and Aedes triseriatus (Diptera: Culicidae) in the laboratory: Effects of density, food, and competition on response to temperature. Journal of Medical Entomology, 37, 40–52.
Thakur, A., & Kocher, D. (2020). Impact of antagonistic crustaceans on the population of Aedes aegypti L. larvae under laboratory conditions. Journal of Vector Borne Diseases, 57, 58–62.
Williams, D. D. (2006). The biology of temporary waters (p. 348). New York: Oxford University Press.
Yoshioka, M., Couret, J., Kim, F., Mc Millan, J., Burkot, T. R., Dotson, E. M., & Vazquez-Prokopec, G. M. (2012). Diet and density dependent competition affect larval performance and oviposition site selection in the mosquito species Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae). Parasites and Vectors, 5(1), 225.
WHO. (2017). ZIKV infection - India. http://www.who.int/csr/don/26-may-2017-zika-ind/en/.
The authors are thankful to the Head, Department of Zoology, Punjab Agricultural University, for providing experimental platform for the successful completion of work.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Thakur, A., Kocher, D.K. The effect of cladoceran, Daphnia magna, on the growth and pupation of Aedes aegypti L. mosquito larvae. JoBAZ 83, 36 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41936-022-00301-x
- Daphnia magna
- Life history parameters
- Mosquito population
- Aedes aegypti