Skip to main content

Diversity and species richness of butterfly in soraipung range of Dehing Patkai National Park, Assam, India



The present study deals with the butterfly diversity in Soraipung Range of Dehing Patkai National Park. The site was chosen on the basis that it lies in between Eastern Himalaya and Indo-Burma which is acclaimed as global biodiversity hotspot.


A total of 92 butterfly species belonging to 5 families were recorded during the study of which 13 species were listed as protected under various schedules of the Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and 11 species were restricted to the Eastern Himalaya, India. Members of the Nymphalidae family were found to be dominant with (41) number of species followed by Papilionidae (17), Lycaenidae (16), Hesperiidae (10) and the least Pieridae (8). The maximum diversity is obtained in Nymphalidae family: where Shannon–Wiener Diversity Index (H′) is 3.604584 and Evenness (E) is 0.970651 while the minimum diversity is in Pieridae family where Shannon–Wiener Diversity Index (H′) is 1.936217 and Evenness (E) is 0.970651.


The study reveals that Soraipung range is rich in butterfly diversity but on the contrary their study is poorly documented. During the survey 13 threatened species and 11 species restricted to the Eastern Himalaya have been also documented in the National Park, thus making it an important butterfly habitat in the state. Therefore, its necessary to conduct more study as well as research on the butterflies in Dehing Patkai National Park for effective conservation and management programs.


Dehing Patkai National Park is located in the districts of Dibrugarh and Tinsukia that interspersed with semi-evergreen deciduous vegetation and lush green flora, the only patch of rainforest in Assam. The region represents an important part of Indo Myanmar bio-diversity hotspots and considered as the most species-rich regions in the Indian Sub-continent. The species richness and endemism make this an important region for butterfly diversity and conservation in India (Gogoi, 2013). Area rich in butterfly are often rich in other fauna too. Butterfly is the nature jewel, distributed worldwide with different ecological functions. They are indicator of healthy environment (Ghazanfar et al. 2016). Their vulnerability makes them quick to react to change in environment. This specificity to vegetation type, worldwide distribution, rapid response to climate change makes them a useful organism to monitor environmental changes (Gowda et al., 2011). Their caterpillars are important source of food for higher life forms like birds, lizards and other insectivorous animal. They are pollinators of a large number of flowering plants, thus serve a wide range of environmental benefits (Losey & Vaughan, 2006). Some butterfly larvae feed on pest like aphids as a result their caterpillars also serve as important biological pest control (Ehrlich, 1984). Butterfly is classified into two superfamilies; Hesperioidea, consisting of a single family Hesperiidae and Papilionoidea, having four families: Papilionidae (Swallowtails), Pieridae, Nymphalidae (Brush-footed butterflies) and Lycaenidae (Kehmikar, 2008). Among the 5 families, the most diverse species of butterfly were belonging to Nymphalidae family followed by Hesperidae, Pieridae and Lycaenidae respectively (Leon-Cortes et al., 2019).

There is a need for the regular monitoring and documentation of butterfly species from the Dehing Patkai National Park as monitoring of species diversity enables estimation of the prospective functional roles of the species. This can also be used as a tool to reduce human mismanagement and pollution in urbanized, protected, industrial and managed areas (Wilson 1997). In previous study, 237–292 species of butterflies were observed from Dehing Patkai National Park earlier known as Jeypore-Reserve Forest along with a large number of very rare species like Indian Yellow-Vein Lancer Pyroneura margherita (Butler, 1879), Bi-coloured Hedge blue Udara selma cerima (Corbet, 1937), Snowy Angle Darpa pteria (Hewitson, 1868) (Gogoi, 2013; Karthikeyan & Venkatesh, 2011; Singh, 2015). Despite of rich biodiversity Dehing Patkai is less explored as well as recent studies were not recorded; hence the present study was undertaken to document the number of butterflies with special reference to their conservation status.


Study Area

Soraipung is a small part or the main access point of the Dehing Patkai National Park. It was earlier known as Dehing Patkai Wildlife Sanctuary, recently on 09 June 2021 it is upgraded as National Park by the Forest Department of Assam. The park is located in the Dibrugarh and Tinsukia districts of Assam with an area of 231.65 km2 rainforest and lies between latitudes- 27°17′53″N and longitudes 95°30′59″E. The climate of the study area is characterized by annual rainfall of more than 4,000 mm. The region supports a rich faunal, avifaunal and floral diversity because of its annual rainfall and diverse vegetation. The vegetation is characterized by trees like Dipterocarpus retusus that dominates the emergent layer of this rainforest and different flowering plants like Mesua ferrea, Amoora wallichi, Dysoxylum binectiferum, Dipterocarpus macrocarpus etc.

Methods of study

Random surveys and Line transect method of Pollard was used for sampling butterflies and to collect necessary study data (Pollard, 1977). Pollard walk was done by walking for one hour on each transact line using a nylon rope within a fixed distance—2.5 m either side of the transect line and 5 m ahead also recorded all butterfly seen inside the area of trails. For Sampling designing altogether five belt transects (TI. T2. T3, T4, T5) were laid down along with fourteen-point count centers (S1. S2. S3. S4, S5. S6. S7, S8, S9, S10, S11, S12, S13, S14). Sampling site were surveyed for a total of five times, thrice in the morning and twice in the evening hours.

Common butterflies were identified on the spot during sampling or by taking photos with the help of camera. Colour patterns, sizes and shapes as well as their designs were considered in identification of the species of butterfly with the help available literature as well as photographs described by (Evans, 1932; Kehmikar, 2008; Kumar et al., 2016; Kunte, 1997; Sunil et al., 2016).

Data analysis

The numbers of species present in each of the four families is considered as the species richness. Species diversity was calculated using Shannon Diversity index H′ =  − ∑ Pi ln(Pi).

where, Pi = Proportion of the ith species.

ln = Natural logarithm of Pi.

Species evenness were calculated using the formula; J = H′/ln (s).

where, H′ = Value of Shannon–Wiener index.

ln s = The natural log of the species richness (total number of species).


Lepidopteran butterflies as a nature jewel occupies a vital place in the ecosystem. The result reveals a total of 92 species belonging to 5 families in the Soraipung range of Dehing Patkai National Park. Among the five families, Nymphalidae were found to be dominant with 41 (45%) number of species, followed by Papilionidae 17(18%), Lycaenidae 16 (17%), Hesperidae 10 (11%) and least Pieridae 8(9%) (Table 1), (Fig. 1). Diversity in term of number of species represent the Shannon-Weiner Diversity Index (H′) of the butterfly families Nymphalidae, Lycaenidae, Papilionidae, Pieridae, Hesperiidae 3.604584, 2.590941, 2.68954, 1.936217, 2.208639 respectively. The evenness of the species belonging to the five families was calculated through Pielou’s Evenness Index and the value was found in between 0.93–0.97 which is a good indication for the ecosystem (Table 2).

Table 1 List of butterfly species reported in Dehing Patkai National Park, Assam
Fig. 1
figure 1

Percentage occurrence of butterfly species under different families

From the survey it was also reported that 11 species of butterflies were restricted to the Eastern Himalaya, India viz. Rhinopalpa Polynice birmana (Fruhstorfer, 1898), Discophora sondaica zal (Westwoot, 1851), Sumalia daraxa daraxa (Doubleday, 1848), Elymnias pealii (Wood-Mason, 1883), Neptis cartica cartica (Moore, 1872), Neptis harita harita (Moore, 1875), Telinga malsarida (Butler, 1868), Chersonesia intermedia rahrioides (Moore, 1899), Celastrina argiolus iynteana (de Niceville, 1884), Papilio nephelus (Boisduval, 1836) and Lamproptera curius curius (Febricius, 1787). On the basis of level of protection provided by Indian Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. 13 species were recorded from the study area belong to different Schedules of the act viz. Elymnias pealii Schedule-I, Acytolepis puspa gisca Schedule-I, Discophora sondaica zal Schedule-I, Spindasis lohita himalayanus (Moore, 1884) Schedule-II, Melanitis zitenius zitenius Schedule-II, Elymnias vasudeva Schedule-II, Athyma ranga ranga Schedule-II, Charaxes bernardus hierax Schedule-II, Chersonesia intermedia rahrioides Schedule-II, Rhinopalpa Polynice birmana Schedule-II, Euploea radamanthus radamanthus Schedule-IV, Pelopidas assamensis Schedule-IV and Appias galba Schedule-IV (Table 3).

Table 2 Species richness in term of number of species, Shannon-Weiner Diversity Index (H′) and Evenness (E) of the Butterfly families observed at Dehing Patkai National Park


During the study a total of 92 species belonging to 5 butterfly families were reported of which family Nymphalidae is found to be dominant with 41 numbers of species. Species belonging to family Nymphalidae were abundant not only in Dehing Patkai National Park but also in other parts. Such as in Dibru-Saikhowa biosphere reserve 45 number of Nymphalidae species were reported followed by Lycaenidae (21), Pieridae (17), Papilionidae (15) and Hesperiidae (7) (Joshi & Dhyani, 2014). 22 Nymphalidae species of over 89 individuals found to be the most abundant family reported in Rowa Wildlife Sanctuary, Tripura (Lodh & Agarwala, 2016). A total of 158 butterfly species were observed in Titabar, Jorhat, Assam, out of which 61 butterflies belongs to Nymphalidae family, 38 Lycaenidae, 29 Hesperiidae, 17 Pieridae, 11 Papilionidae and two from family Riodinidae (Konwar & Bortamuly, 2021). 252 species were recorded from Manas World Heritage Site of which Nymphalidae was found to be dominant with 101 species followed by Lycaenidae 63, Hesperiidae 35, Pieridae 27, Papilionidae 24 and Riodinidae 2 (Bhattacharjee & Ahmed, 2020). Species richness and butterfly diversity in the Trishna Wildlife Sanctuary in Tripura showed the presence of 59 species of butterflies that included 21 distinctive species and 9 species included in the threatened category (Majumder et al., 2012). Islam et al., (2022) reported a total of 150 species of butterflies belonging to six families viz., Nymphalidae (44.89%), Lycaenidae (23.12%), Pieridae (12.24%), Hesperidae (10.20%), Papilionidae (8.16%) and Riodinidae (1.36%) in the Raimona National Park, Assam. Chahar et al. (2021) reported a total of 39 species of butterflies belonging to five families of which family Nymphalidae is the dominating family with 14 species. The area has cultivated and wild plants which serve as host plant for laying the eggs and nectar plants for nectar in NES Ratnam College campus and Kukreja residential complex, Mumbai. Maximum number of species with dominant diversity were reported in family Nymphalidae (n = 14, H = 2.33, D = 8.81) while least in family Hesperidae (n = 3, H = 1.04, D = 2.67) in the campus of Cotton University, Assam, India (Bishaya et al., 2021). In North-East India, many of the biodiversity rich area are yet to be explored for records of fauna and flora including insect diversity, which represent a major proportion of the faunal diversity of tropical forests (Clark & May, 2002; Lewis & Basset, 2005; Losey & Vaughan, 2006). Earlier a total of 292 species of butterflies were recorded from Joypure Reserve Forest (Gogoi, 2013). This may be because the area is lies in the foothills of Patkai-Bum hill ranges of Arunachal Pradesh which is likely to influence the bio-geographic pattern of many Malayan butterflies in Northeastern India (Evans, 1932; Watt & Boggs, 2003). Butterflies are important model group in ecology and conservation they perform different ecological services such as pollination, nutrient decomposition, good indicators of the ecosystem health etc. (Koh, 2007; Kunte, 1997; Majumder et al., 2012). 6 numbers of rare species were also found in Dehing Patkai during the study period viz. Rhinopalpa Polynice birmana (Fruhstorfer, 1898), Athyma ranga ranga (Moore, 1858), Telinga malsarida (Butler, 1868), Chersonesia intermedia rahrioides (Moore, 1899), Eurema andersonii jordani (Moore, 1886) and Atrophaneura aidoneus that are similarly reported by (Gogoi, 2013; Watt & Boggs, 2003). As the study area harbors different species of rare and endemic butterflies, the Dehing Patkai National Park can be an important site for the Conservation of butterflies. Some of the common or restricted butterflies which were observed in the study area are given in (Fig. 2). During study different forms of Kallima inachus inachus (Doyere, 1840) and Catopsilia pyranthe pyranthe (Linnaeus, 1758) as well as different species of genus Elymnias, Athyma, Junonia, Heliophorus and Papilio were also recorded. Many of the species shows a sexual dimorphism such as in Hypolimnus bolina jacintha (Drury, 1773). This phenomenon is probably influence by underlying genetic architecture responsible for sex limited expression (Oliver & Monteiro, 2010).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Shannon-Weiner Diversity Index (H′) and Evenness (E) of the Butterfly families observed at Dehing Patkai National Park

Among the families, the maximum species richness is obtained in Nymphalidae family: where Shannon–Wiener Diversity Index (H) is 3.604584 and Evenness is 0.970651 while the minimum is in Pieridae where Shannon–Wiener Diversity Index (H) is 1.936217 and Evenness is 0.970651. The result indicating that the study area is more diverse of species of butterfly. Variety of microhabitats and vegetation for the butterflies might be the reasons for the occurrence of good number of species richness and diversity (Sreekumar & Balakrishna, 2001). Moreover, the Shannon Evenness (E) revealed that the distribution of butterfly species of five families was almost of the same or even ranges from (0.93 to 0.97) (Table 2). Similar, result reported by Basavarajappa et al., (2018) the Shannon diversity index ranged between 4.49 and 4.59 and the Shannon ‘E’ (Evenness) indices were 0.98 and 0.94, suggesting evenness between the six forests ranges. Wale and Abdella, (2021) recorded a total of 27,568 butterflies belonged to three families, five subfamilies, and eight genera. According them Equitability (Pielou’s index) showed equal distribution of the species, i.e., 0.8 to 0.9 in forest, except at the open grassland at Tara Gedam (0.3) in northwestern Ethiopia. Thus, the present study provided insight into the butterflies of Dehing Patkai National Park and has incited further research for maintenance of forest habitats for butterfly conservation (Fig. 3).

Table 3 Species protected under Indian Wildlife (Protection) act, 1972
Fig. 3
figure 3figure 3

Family-Nymphalidae (1) Doleschallia bisaltide indica (Moore, 1899), (2)(3) Kallima inachus inachus (Doyere, 1840), (4) Moduza procris procris (Cramer, 1777), (5) Sumalia daraxa daraxa (Doubleday, 1848), (6) Athyma selenophora bahula (Moore, 1858), (7) Charaxes bernardus hierax (C. & R. Felder, 1793), (8) Cirrochroa aoris aoris (Doubleday, 1847), (9) Male Hypolimnus bolina jacintha (Drury, 1773), (10) Female Hypolimnus bolina jacintha (Drury, 1773), (11) Charaxes bharata (Felder, 1867), (12) Female Elymnias hypermnestra undularis (Linnaeus, 1763), (13) Neptis hylas varmona (Moore, 1872), (14) Euploea radamanthus radamanthus (Febricius, 1793), (15) Athyma ranga ranga (Moore, 1858), (16) Junonia atlites atlites (Linnaeus, 1763), (17) Junonia lemonias lemonias (Linnaeus, 1758), (18) Junonia almana almana (Linnaeus, 1758), (19) Elymnias malelas malelas (Hewitson, 1863) and (20) Elymnias Vasudeva (Moore, 1858) (21) Ypthima baldus baldus (Febricius, 1775), (22) Euthalia aconthea garuda (Moore, 1858), (23) Rhinopalpa polynice birmana (Fruhstorfer, 1898) and (24) Athyma inara inara (Westwood, 1850). Family- Lycaenidae (25) Acytolepis puspa gisca (Fruhstorfer, 1910), (26) Heliophorus epicles latilimbata (Fruhstorfer, 1908) (27) Lampides boeticus (Linnaeus, 1767), (28) Spindasis lohita himalayanus (Moore, 1884) and (29) Zizeeria karsandra (Moore, 1865), (30) Castalius rosimon rosimon (Febricius, 1775), (31) Caleta elna noliteia (Fruhstorfer, 1918), (32) Pseudozizeeria maha maha (Kollar, 1844) and (33) Heliophorus indicus (Fruhstorfer, 1908). Family- Pieridae (34) Appias galba (Wallance, 1867), (35) Pieris canidia indica (Evans, 1926), (36) Delias pasithoe pasithoe (Linnaeus, 1767), (37) Eurema hecabe hecabe (Linnaeus, 1758), (38, 39) Catopsilia pyranthe pyranthe (Linnaeus, 1758). Family- Papilionidea (40) Byasa polyeuctes polyeuctes (Doubleday, 1842), (41) Graphium antiphates nebulosus (Butler, 1881), (42) Papilio nephelus (Boisduval, 1836), (43) Papilio demoleous demoleous (Linnaeus, 1758), (44) Papilio protenor eurotenor (Fruhstorfer, 1908), (45) Atrophaneura aidoneus (Doubleday, 1845) and (46) Papilio paris paris (Linnaeus, 1758). Family- Hesperiidia (47) Burara amara (Moore, 1866), (48) Cupitha purreea (Moore, 1877), (49) Telicota sp. and (50) Pseudocoladenia sp.


The occurrence of butterflies in a particular area is very significant as a pollinator and biological indicators. Their presence or absence can tell us about the health and stability of the ecosystem. In the presence study a total of 92 species of butterflies were reported from the Soraipung Range of Dehing Patkai National Park. Among all the butterfly families Nymphalidae family was found to be dominant in number followed by Papilionidae, Lycaenidae, Hesperiidae and the least Pieridae. 11 species of butterfly were found to be restricted to the Eastern Himalaya and 13 species of butterflies were listed as protected under various schedules of the Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. Due to their beneficial ecological role and good number of occurrence appropriate strategies should be made for their conservation in different areas of Dehing Patkai National Park.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.



Transect line


Sampling site


Shannon-Weiner diversity index


Shannon Evenness


Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act


  • Basavarajappa, S., Gopi, K. V., & Santhosh, S. (2018). Butterfly species composition and diversity in a protected area of Karnataka, India. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation 10(10), 432–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharjee, R., & Ahmed, R. (2020). butterflies of manas world heritage site, Assam, India. Applied Ecology and Environmental Science, 8(2), 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishaya, P., Saikia, K., & Gogoi, R. (2021). Butterfly Diversity in Cotton University Campus, Guwahati, Assam India. Uttar Pradesh Journal of Zoology 42(24), 396–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. A., & May, R. M. (2002). Taxonomic bias in conservation research. Science, 297, 191–192.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, W. H. (1932). The Identification of Indian Butterflies (2nd ed.). Bombay Natural History Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghazoul, J. (2002). Impact of logging on the richness and diversity of forest butterflies in a tropical dry forest in Thailand. Biodiversity and Conservation 11, 521–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gogoi, M. J. (2013). A preliminary checklist of butterflies recorded from Jeypore-Dihing forest, eastern Assam, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 5, 3684–3696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowda, R. H. T., Kumara, V., Promod, A. F., & Hosetti, B. B. (2011). Butterfly diversity, seasonality and status in Lakkavalli Range of Bhadra wildlife Sanctuary, Karnataka. World Journal of Science and Technology 1(11), 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, N., Chhetri, T., Borkataki, U., Basumatary, S., & Rahman, M. (2022). Abundance and diversity of butterflies in Raimona National Park of Assam, India. International Journal of Entomology Research 7(2), 54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, B. K., & Dhyani, S. (2014). Butterflies diversity, distribution and threats in dibru-saikhowa biosphere reserve Assam North-East India: A review. World Journal of Zoology 9, 240–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karthikeyan, S., Venkatesh, V. (2011). Snowy Angle Darpa pteria. The Wild Wanderer.

  • Kehmikar, I. (2008). The book of the Indian Butterflies. Bombay Natural History Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, L. P. (2007). Impacts of land use change on South-East Asian Forest butterflies: A review. Journal of Applied Ecology 44, 703–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konwar, A., & Bortamuly, M. (2021). Observation on butterflies of non-protected area of Titabar, Assam India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 13(5), 18364–18377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A., Mishra, S., & Kanaujia, A. (2016). Butterfly fauna of Katernia Ghats Wildlife sanctuary Uttar Pradesh. International Journal of Species 17(56), 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunte, K. J. (1997). Seasonal patterns in butterfly abundance and species diversity in four tropical habitats in Northern Western Ghats. Journal of Bioscience 22, 593–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leon-Cortes, J. L., Caballero, U., Miss- Barrera, I. D., & Giron-Intzin, M. (2019). Preserving butterfly diversity in an ever- expanding urban lands cape? A case study in the highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. Journal of Insect Conservation 23, 404–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, O.T., & Basset, Y. (2005). Insect conservation in tropical forests, Insect conservation biology. In: Proceedings of the royal entomological society's 23rd international symposium, University of Sussex, UK, pp 34–56.

  • Lodh, R., & Agarwala, B. K. (2016). Rapid assessment of diversity and conservation of butterflies in Rowa Wildlife Sanctuary: An Indo-Burmese hotspot- Tripura, North-East. India. Tropical Ecology 57, 231–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Losey, J. E., & Vaughan, M. (2006). The economic value of ecological services provided by insects. BioScience, 56, 311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majumder, J., Lodh, R., & Agarwala, B. K. (2012). Butterfly species richness and diversity in the Trishna Wildlife Sanctuary in South Asia. Journal of Insect Science 13, 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, J. C., & Monteiro, A. (2010). On the origin of sexual dimorphism in butterflies. Proceedings of Royal Society 278(1714), 1981–1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, E. (1977). A Method for assessing changes in abundance of butterflies. Biological Conservation 12, 116–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. P. (2015). Recent record of a rarely recorded species, the Veined Palmer Hidari bhawani de Nicéville, 1888 (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Aeromachini) from Jorhat, Assam, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 7, 6839–6840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreekumar, P. G., & Balakrishna, M. (2001). Diversity and habitat preferences of butterflies in Neyyar Wildlife Sanctuary, South India. Entomology 26(1), 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunil, K., Deepti, M., Priyanka, V. L., & Lily, S. N. (2016). Butterfly diversity of the gangetic plain (Doaba) at Allahabad, UP, India. Journal of Entomology Studies 4(6), 268–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wale, M., & Abdella, S. (2021). Butterfly diversity and abundance in the middle afromontane area of northwestern Ethiopia. Psyche: A Journal of Entomology, pp. 2–13.

  • Watt, W. B., & Boggs, C. L. (2003). Synthesis: Butterflies as model systems in ecology and evolution-present and future. In C. L. Boggf, W. B. Watt, & P. R. Ehrlich (Eds.), Butterflies: Ecology and evolution taking flight (pp. 603–613). The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1997). Introduction. In M. L. Reaka-Kudla, D. E. Wilson, & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), Biodiversity II (pp. 1–3). Henry Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references


Not Applicable.


Not Applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Authors AC and AB were involved in the sampling, statistical analysis, identification of studied species, manuscript preparation and site management. Author RG managed the analyses of the study and literature searches. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renu Gogoi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not Applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not Applicable.

Competing Interests

Authors have declared that no conflict interests exist.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gogoi, R., Chetry, A. & Bhuyan, A. Diversity and species richness of butterfly in soraipung range of Dehing Patkai National Park, Assam, India. JoBAZ 84, 6 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Dehing-Patkai
  • Hesperiidae
  • Lycaenidae
  • Nymphalidae
  • Papilionidae
  • Pieridae
  • Soraipung