Skip to main content

Proposal of a mosquito control plan of Smir-Restinga region (north-west of Morocco)

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

The present study conducted on mosquitoes in the region of Restinga Smir, located in the north-west of Morocco, attempts to provide a scientific platform for an appropriate mosquito control plan for this tourism spot. The aim of this plan is to perfect the methods of the means of mosquito control for an effective fight against mosquitoes in this area, known for their strong nuisance (bites) and their ability to transmit several deadly diseases.

Results

Monitoring of mosquito species in the Smir marshes, especially those of public health interest, shows that they are distributed differently in the permanent and temporary environments. The establishment and analysis of their development cycles shows that their periods of activity in the different stations of the study area overlap in several cases, especially in the permanent stations. The study of the resistance of these species to the organophosphate insecticides commonly used for mosquito control in the region allowed to conclude the doses of insecticides (LC 90) that could be used for this mosquito control programme.

Conclusions

The proposed mosquito control programme gives an estimate of the timing of larval treatments and the insecticides that may be used. This plan was concluded based on the results obtained from the study of life cycles, spatial and temporal distribution of mosquitoes in the Smir area and their resistance to the organophosphate insecticides most used by public health services.

Background

Larval control, particularly against disease-carrying mosquitoes, is widely used worldwide. World Health Organization (WHO) reports from its national malaria control programmes that 27 malaria-endemic countries around the world are conducting larviciding operations in some malaria transmission sites. Sixteen countries report using chemical treatments for this purpose and 13 others report using biological control (WHO, 2005a, 2005b, 2021, 2022).

The north of Morocco and in particular the Smir area is an area in full development. However, among the causes that hinder its socio-economic and particularly tourist expansion are the nuisances caused by mosquitoes. In addition to the risk that these haematophagous insects present as vectors of disease, their great aggressiveness, especially during the hot season, is well known.

The present work completes our previous studies about the geographical distribution of mosquitoes in the Smir region, their ecological preferences and the study of the resistance of species of interest for public health, namely Anopheles labranchiae, Culex pipiens, Ochlerotatus detritus and Ochlerotatus caspius, to the most commonly used insecticides in Morocco (El Joubari et al., ). The establishment of the life cycles of these mosquitoes allowed the determination of the periods of their maximum density by specifying the development periods of their larval generations. These data will allow us to propose an adequate scientific plan for mosquito control in this wetland. This control plan is essentially based on larval control. This control method is effective because the larvae are better controllable and a relatively large proportion of the adulticide products sprayed is lost to the environment (Bedos et al., 2002), more than 40% according to Marliere (2001). From an environmental and health perspective, the consequences of these products are particularly severe in terms of water contamination (surface and groundwater) (Brunet et al., 2013).

The insecticides proposed to be used for the present demoustication plan, whose doses and efficacy are tested, are the organophosphates most used in mosquito control in Morocco: Temephos, Malathion, Fenthion, Fenitrothion and chlorpyrifos (Faraj et al., 2010). These compounds are chemically similar, very little persistent in the environment and rapidly degrade in humid and warm climate (WHO, 1986, 2009). ANSES (National Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety) states that these substances are interesting for pest control and have a medium toxicity/ecotoxicity profile (ANSES, 2011).

Methods

Study area

The Smir region is a SBEI (Site of Biological and Ecological Interest) due to its great biological and ecological biodiversity (AEFCS, 1996). It is located in the north-west of Morocco, on the eastern side of the peninsula of Tangier, near the town of Mdi'q and halfway between the cities of Tétouan and Sebta (Fig. 1). This Mediterranean wetland includes a lagoon, marshes, a wadi and the Smir dam. Its surface area is about 175 hectares and its climate is Mediterranean with an average annual rainfall of about 927.95 mm and an average annual temperature of 18.4 °C. Several types of hydrological inputs feed the Smir wetland: marine waters, sewage, groundwater and the flow of the Wadi Smir. It should be noted that this hydrology has been greatly modified by the various development projects that have been taking place in the area in recent years. (Ater et al., 1997, Stitou, 2002, Dakki et al., 2005, El Fellah, 2005, Ennabili et al., 2005, LWBA, 2012, El Joubari et al., 2014, 2015a).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Location of the study area

On the ground

The present study was carried out by prospecting 20 potential mosquito breeding sites (from station 1 to station 20) in the Smir marshes was carried out every two weeks during the spring–summer periods of 2010 and 2011. The sampling of mosquito larvae was conducted using the « Dipping method» (Coffinet et al., 2009). A dip net with a mesh size of 0.1 mm, a diameter of 25 cm and a length of 50 cm was used.

In the laboratory

A binocular magnifying (Olympus), an optical microscope (Optech) and the mosquito identification keys of Himmi & al. 1995 and Tachet & al. 2006 were the tools for studying and identifying of collected mosquitoes larvae.

The susceptibility of mosquito larvae to the four insecticides studied (Temephos, Malathion, Fenthion, Fenitrothion and chlorpyrifos) was being carried out following the standard protocols of WHO: larvicidal bioassays test (Cup test) (WHO, 2005a, 2005b). This test consists of introducing 20 larvae of the 3rd and 4th stage (L3 and L4) in plastic beakers containing 1 ml of insecticide at different concentrations and 99 ml of distilled water. 5 to 8 concentrations are used for each test, in order to obtain, as a minimum, a mortality of less than 50% for two concentrations, a mortality of more than 50% for two other concentrations and a concentration causing 100% mortality of the mosquito larvae, where possible. The amount of insecticide is replaced by ethanol for the control test. Results are read after 24 h.

Data processing

The statistical treatment of the results of the tests of sensitivity of mosquitoes to insecticides studied was carried out using the log-probit analysis software (Win DL version 2.0) (Giner et al., 1999) for the determination of the lethal concentration (LC 90).

Results

Entomological prospecting and investigation

The monitoring of the 20 selected potential mosquito breeding sites in the region of Smir allowed us to collect a total of 25,940 mosquito larvae of which four species are harmful and of great interest for public health. These species represent the major part of the mosquitoes in the region of Smir with a percentage of 72.3% of the total mosquitoes captured. These species are: Culex pipiens (Linnaeus, 1758), Anopheles labranchiae ((Meigen, 1818), Ochlerotatus detritus (Haliday, 1833) and Ochlerotatus caspius (Pallas, 1771). These species represent, respectively, 40.24% (10,438 larvae), 14.79% (3836 larvae), 10.86% (2817 larvae) and 6.41% (1662 larvae) of the total culicidian fauna collected. They can cohabit in the same sites (Table 1), and therefore, their activity periods overlap in the majority of the stations studied.

Table 1 Distribution of studied Culicidae species in the Smir marshes as a percentage of abundance

Studies of the life cycles of mosquito species for the determination of timing of larval control interventions

The regular monitoring of the mosquito species studied at the different stations in the study area has also made it possible to establish their life cycles and specify their maximum activity periods. This will be useful in determining the appropriate periods for larval control interventions, which are summarised in Table 2.

Table 2 Control periods of mosquito species in Smir Marshes

Insecticide doses that can be used for antilarval interventions

According to the sensitivity tests of the species A. labranchiae, C. pipiens, O. detritus and O. caspius towards the five insecticides: Temephos, Malathion, Fenthion, Fenitrothion and chlorpyrifos, Table 3 represents LC 90 values of insecticides obtained from populations of mosquito larvae tested in the Smir region.

Table 3 LC 90 values of insecticides obtained from populations of mosquito larvae tested in the Smir region

Proposed mosquito control plan for the Smir marshes

The combination of the data collected from the study of the distribution of culicidian species in the Smir marshes, their life cycles and their resistance to the insecticides tested has made it possible to propose a programme for the control of mosquitoes in this region (Table 4). It determines the antilarval control periods according to the mosquito species, the type(s) of insecticide(s) likely to be used (s) and the dose for each of these insecticides in mg/l.

Table 4 Mosquito control plan for the Smir area

When several species cohabit the same environment, the dose of insecticide that can be used for larval control treatments is the higher dose obtained (LC 90 higher). Similarly, overlapping control periods are extended over the longest period of coexistence of species in the environment.

Discussion

Studies of the life cycles of mosquito species for the determination of timing of larval control interventions

The determination of the larval control periods is relatively difficult to achieve because the precise setting of treatment dates is not possible, since it is based on monitoring results. During the cold season of the year, monitoring of the roosts every 15 days would be sufficient and would guarantee the treatment of the larvae. In contrast, during the warm season, the life cycles of mosquito species are shorter with eggs reaching the pupal stage in less than 10 days, and therefore, a weekly visit of the breeding sites is mandatory. Furthermore, the mosquito species studied do not develop in the same way in permanent waters as in temporary ones.

The monitoring of the four targeted Culicidae species has enabled us to obtain the following results:

Culex pipiens

In Morocco, C. pipiens plays a major role in the severe nuisance experienced by most urban areas (Faraj et al., 2006). This mosquito has been strongly suspected in West Nile virus transmission and Rift Valley fever in the Maghreb region (Amraoui, 2012, Amraoui et al., 2012). Several authors confirm that the role of this species in the transmission of outbreaks of West Nile virus that affected Morocco in 1996 and 2003 is strongly suspected (Murgue et al., 2001, EL Harrack et al., 1997, Schuffenecker et al., 2003, Faraj et al., 2006, El Ouali Lalami 2014).

In the permanent environment of the study region, the species is present continuously throughout the year with the exception of January and the first half of February when the species cannot withstand the winter cold. The treatment of C. pipiens permanent breeding sites should be carried out regularly: from mid-February (as soon as the first instar larvae appear) to the end of December.

Culex pipiens is present in the temporary stations from the end of February until the drying of the environment (around the end of June), and from around mid-September until mid-December. The treatment in this case should be spread over two periods: from the end of February until the end of June and from mid-September until mid-December following the appearance of L1 larvae.

Anopheles labranchiae

It is the mosquito species of radical importance to Moroccan human health. Apart from being a nuisance, Anopheles labranchiae is the major malaria vector in Morocco. This has been confirmed by numerous studies (Guy 1976, Louah 1995, Faraj et al., 2004, 2008, 2009, Himmi, 2007, El Ouali Lalami et al., 2010, Trari et al., 2011, Laboudi et al., 2012, 2014a, 2014b, El Joubari et al., 2015b).

In a permanent environment of Smir marshes, A. labranchiae is present from mid-March to the end of November. Increases in the density of this species are noted mainly in the middle of spring and at the beginning of summer (May and June). This high abundance continues in the months of July and August.

Anopheles labranchiae is collected in the temporary environment from mid-March to the end of June (drying of the environment). It reappears around mid-October in this type of stations and disappears from the end of November.

Because of the specificity of this species, its monitoring would be meticulous especially with its great dispersion in the study area. The control of A. labranchiae is expected to take place from mid-March to the end of November as soon as L1 larvae appear in the permanent environments. The treatment of the temporary roosts must therefore be carried out in two periods: from mid-March to the end of June and from mid-October to the end of November as soon as the L1 larvae appear.

Ochlerotatus detritus and Ochlerotatus caspius

These two species of the genus Ochlerotatus are not declared disease vectors in Morocco, but their nuisance is extremely important for the majority of coastal towns in Morocco (Himmi, 2007, El Joubari et al., 2015b).

Ochlerotatus detritus occupies the permanent environment from the end of February to the end of November with 2 peaks of abundance: the first is in summer, marked in the period from the end of June to the beginning of July, and the second is in autumn, noted after the first autumnal rainfall (early October). The control of this species in the permanent stations would take place from the end of February to the end of November as soon as the first instar larvae (L1) appear.

Ochlerotatus detritus is present in temporary biotope from the beginning of April until the end of June (drying of the station). The species repopulates the area in early October and disappears towards the end of November. The treatment of the breeding sites of this species should therefore be spread over two periods: from the beginning of April to the end of June and from the early of October to the end of November as soon as the L1 larvae appear.

Ochlerotatus caspius is present continuously in the permanent environment of the study area from the beginning of April until the end of November. As with the previous species, both summer and fall peaks are also noted for O. caspius.

The treatment of the breeding sites of this species is therefore carried out from the beginning of April until the end of November since the appearance of the L1 larvae.

Table 3 summarizes the appropriate control periods for the Culicidae species studied in the temporary and permanent waters of the Smir marshes.

Insecticide doses that can be used for antilarval interventions

Culex pipiens

This is the most studied species among those presented in our work. For temephos, we found an LC 90 of 0.0243 mg/l. A similar result was reported by Sinegre (1984), who gave an LC 90 of 0.036 mg/l. On the other hand, Faraj et al., (2002) cite a higher LC 90 of 0.1 mg/l in the Mohammadia region of Morocco. In Tunisia, Chadli et al., (1986) report lower LC 90 values ranging from 0.0009 to 0.0166 mg/l.

The lethal concentration 90 of chlorpyrifos towards Culex pipiens found by the present study is 0.0254 mg/l. This result is consistent with those of Faraj et al., (2002), who reported an LC 90 of 0.02 mg/l in central Morocco, and Chadli et al., (1986), who found LC 90 s of between 0.0018 mg/l and 0.035 mg/l in Tunisia. However, the highest values are found by Ben Cheikh et al., (1995) still in Tunisia, who give a value of 0.27 mg/l, and in France, by Sinegre (1984), who finds that LC 90 of C. pipiens in relation to chlorpyrifos is 0.2 mg/l. Lower LC 90 values were reported in the south of France by Raymond et al., (1985), ranging from 0.012 to 0.02 mg/l, the upper limit of which is close to the value found in the present study.

For fenitrothion, the LC 90 found does not exceed 0.0026 mg/l. This value seems very low compared with other studies. Faraj et al., (2002) reported an LC 90 of 0.046 mg/l in the Skhirat-Temara region of Morocco. Sinegre et al., (1977) reported a higher LC 90 of 0.065 mg/l in the south of France.

For fenthion, the LC 90 found was 0.0547 mg/l. Unlike fenitrothion, this value is much higher than that found by Sinegre et al., (1977), who reported an LC 90 of 0.033 mg/l in southern France. In Tunisia, Chadli et al., (1986) report LC 90 values varying between 0.026 mg/l and 0.35 mg/l.

The LC 90 of C. pipiens in relation to malathion is 0.0585 mg/l. This value also seems very low compared with that cited by Faraj et al., (2002) in the Skhirat-Temara and Rabat regions of Morocco, which is 3.6 mg/l. Similarly, Sinegre et al., (1977) found a similarly high LC 90 in Midi France, equal to 0.1 mg/l.

Anopheles labranchiae

The LC 90 of chlorpyrifos for this species is 0.0139 mg/l. This value is very high compared with the range found by Krida et al., (1998) in several regions of Tunisia in 1997, where LC 90 values varied between 0.00437 mg/l and 0.00518 mg/l.

For temephos, Faraj et al., (2010) report LC 90 values of between 0.0362 mg/l and 0.1058 mg/l, while we found a lower value of 0.0168 mg/l. Larhbali et al., (2010) found in the province of Khémissat (Morocco) an LC 90 comparable to that of the present study, which was 0.015 mg/l.

The comparison of the LC 90 obtained for the five insecticides studied with the WHO recommended doses for the same insecticides shows that the latter are higher, and this can be explained by the fact that the tested populations of this species have not undergone excessive treatments by these organophosphate insecticides.

Ochlerotatus detritus and Ochlerotatus caspius

For these two species, our results are relatifly comparable with those obtained in France where Sinegre (1984) found, by testing the sensitivity of these two species to temephos and fenitrothion, that the LC 90 of fenitrothion is between 0.0014 mg/l and 0.016 mg/l. These results seem very similar to those of the present study where the LC 90 for fenitrothion is 0.0201 mg/l and 0.0019 mg/l for O. detritus and O. caspius, respectively. However, the same author states lower LC 90 values for temephos vary between 0.002 mg/l and 0.02 mg/l, whereas the values obtained by the present work are 0,0215 for O. detritus and 0.0378 mg/l for O. caspius.

The LC 90 obtained for chlorpyrifos in relation to Ochlerotatus detritus was 0.0146 mg/l, while that for temephos was 0.0215 mg/l. In Tunisia, Chadli et al., 1986 reported lower LC 90 values ranging from 0.0005 to 0.002 mg/l for chlorpyrifos and from 0.0009 to 0.0055 mg/l for temephos.

Conclusions

The results obtained during the study of the life cycles, the spatial and temporal distribution of mosquitoes in the Smir region and their resistance towards five organophosphate insecticides, served as the basis for the present proposal of a mosquito control plan for this wetland. This programme gives an estimate of the timing of larval treatments and the insecticides that may be used.

Depending on the species, monitoring of mosquitoes in Smir marshes generally takes place around the beginning of spring (end of February—early of March) until the temporary breeding sites dry out (around the end of June). It generally continues as soon as the sites are repopulated following autumn rainfall. In the permanent stations of the Smir area, the mosquito species develop continuously and their permanent monitoring particularly during the periods of their maximum abundance (spring–summer or summer–autumn depending on the species) would be of great interest for the success of the mosquito control programme.

The evaluation of the effectiveness of the larval treatments starts within 48 h after the treatment. Depending on the persistence of the insecticides used, the resumption of treatment is carried out as soon as the observation of a possible increase in the larval density of the species. This step is essential for monitoring the appearance of resistance to larvicide products used.

Availability of data and materials

This published paper contains all of the data collected throughout the research.

Change history

  • 22 February 2024

    The correct family name of the corresponding author is El Joubari

Abbreviations

FAO:

Food and Agriculture Organization

WHO:

World Health Organization

ANSES:

National Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety

LWBA:

Loukkos Water Basin Agency

References

  • AEFCS. (1996). Morocco’s master plan for protected areas. Unpublished Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amraoui, F. (2012). The Culex pipiens mosquito, potential vector of West Nile virus and Rift Valley fever in the Maghreb region. PhD thesis, Mohammed V University, Agdal, Rabat, Morocco.

  • Amraoui, F., Krida, G., Bouattour, A., Rhim, A., Daaboub, J., Harrat, Z., Boubidi, S., Tijane, M., Sarih, M., & Failloux, A. (2012). Culex pipiens, an experimental efficient vector of west Nile and Rift valley fever viruses in the Maghreb region. PLoS ONE, 7(5), e36757.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • ANSES. (2011). Research on insecticides potentially usable in vector control. National agency for food, environmental and occupational health and safety opinion report, France. DC: National agency for food, environmental and occupational health and safety.

  • Ater, M., Dakki, M. (1997). Ecological and socio-economic potentials of the coastal marshes of Smir (Mediterranean coast of Morocco): main threats and conservation opportunities. In Proceedings of the Seminar on the marshes Smir-Restinga (Morocco): ecology and development proposals, Bulletin of the Scientific Institute of Rabat, Special Report, pp 1-8.

  • Bedos, C., Cellier, P., Calvet, R., & Barriuso, E. (2002). Occurrence of pesticides in the atmosphere in France. Agronomy Journal, 22(1), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben Cheikh, H., Marrakchi, M., & Pasteur, N. (1995). Evidence of very strong resistance to Chlorpyrifos and Permethrin in populations of Culex pipiens in Tunisia. Archives of the Institut Pasteur in Tunis, 72(1/2), 7–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brunet, Y., Dupont, S., Chahine, A., & Sinfort, C. (2013). Modelling of pesticide aerial dispersion and exposure levels at the landscape scale/Pesticide risk assessment and reduction programme. MODAPEX project report. MODAPEX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadli, A., Kooli, J., Sinegre, G., & Scirocchi, A. (1986). Sensitivity of mosquito larvae to organophosphates in the Tunis region, 1984 and 1985. Pasteur Institute in Tunis, 66(1–2), 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffinet, T., Rogier, C., & Pages, F. (2009). Evaluation of Anopheles aggressiveness and risk of malaria transmission: Methods used in the French armies. The Journal of Medicine in the Tropics, 69(2), 109–122.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dakki, M., Hamman, F., & Hammada, S. (2005). Mapping the natural habitats of a mediterranean coastal wetland: the Smir marshes. Bulletin of the Scientific Institute of Rabat, General Series, 4, 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Harrak, M., Le Guenno, B., & Gounon, P. (1997). Isolation of the West Nile virus in Morocco. Virology, 1, 248–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Joubari, M., Hajji, K., Himmi, O., El Alami, M., El Agbani, M. A., & Louah, A. (2015a). Study of macroinvertebrates (Gastropods, Diptera and Odonata) of the smir-restinga marshes (North-West Morocco). Journal of Faunistic Entomology, 68, 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Joubari, M., Louah, A., & Himmi, O. (2014). Mosquitoes (Diptera, Culicidae) of the Smir marshes (northwestern Morocco): Inventory and biotypology. Bulletin of the Society of Exotic Pathology, 107, 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13149-014-0327-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Joubari, M., Louah, A., & Himmi, O. (2015b). Sensitivity of Anopheles labranchiae, Culex pipiens, Ochlerotatus detritus and Ochlerotatus caspius mosquitoes from the region of Smir (North–West Morocco) to organophosphates used in public health. Journal of Environment, Risks and Health, 14(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1684/ers.2014.0755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Ouali Lalami, A., El-Akhal, F., El Amri, N., Maniar, S., & Faraj, C. (2014). Status of Culex pipiens mosquito resistance to temephos in central Morocco. Bulletin of the Exotic Pathology Society, 107(3), 194–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennabili, A., & Ater, M. (2005). Floristic diversity and biomass production of Smir marshes macrophytes. In Sensitive coastal ecosystems of the Mediterranean : case of the Smir coastline, Bulletin of the Scientific Institute of Rabat, General series 4, 17–25.

  • Faraj, C., Adlaoui, E., Brengues, C., Fontenille, D., & Lyagoubi, M. (2008). An labranchiae resistance to DDT in Morocco: Development, identification of mechanisms and choice of an alternative insecticide. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 14(4), 776–783.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faraj, C., Adlaoui, E., Elkohli, M., Herrak, T., Ameur, B., & Chandre, F. (2010). Review of temephos discriminating concentration for monitoring the susceptibility of Anopheles labranchiae (Falleroni, 1926), malaria vector in Morocco. Malaria Research and Treatment. https://doi.org/10.4061/2010/126085

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Faraj, C., Adlaoui, E., Ouahabi, S., Rhajaoui, M., Fontenille, D., & Lyagoubi, M. (2009). Entomological investigations in the region of the last malaria focus in Morocco. Acta Tropica, 109, 70–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faraj, C., Adlaoui, E., Saaf, N., Romi, R., Boccolini, D., Di Luca, M., & Lyagoubi, M. (2004). Note on the Anopheles maculipennis complex in Morocco. Bulletin of the Society of Exotic Pathology, 97(4), 293–294.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faraj, C., Elkohli, M., Elrhazi, M., Laqrâa, L., & Lyagoubi, M. (2002). Current level of resistance of the Culex pipiens mosquito to insecticides in Morocco. Science Letters, 4(1), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faraj, C., Elkohli, M., & Lyagoubi, M. (2006). Gonotrophic cycle of Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae), potential vector of the West Nile virus, in Morocco: Estimation of the duration in the laboratory. Bulletin of the Exotic Pathology Society, 99(2), 119–121.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El Fellah, B. (2005). Geomorphology and cartography of the Oued Smir watershed. In Sensitive coastal ecosystems of the Mediterranean: case of the Smir coastline, Bulletin of the Scientific Institute of Rabat, General Series, pp. 1–8.

  • Giner, M., Vassal, C., Kouaik, Z., Chiroleu, F., Vassal, J.M. (1999). Win DL version 2.0. Paris: CIRAD-CA, URBI/MABIS.

  • Guy, Y., Salieres, A., & Boesiger, E. (1976). Contribution to the study of the maculipennis complex (Diptera—Culicidae—Anophelinae). developed in 1975. Annals of Biology, 15, 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmi, O., Dakki, M., Trari, B., & El Agbani, MA. (1995). The Culicidae of Morocco: identification keys, with biological and ecological data. Bulletin of the Scientific Institute of Rabat, Zoology Series N° 44, 51.

  • Himmi, O. (2007). Culicidae (Insects, diptera) from Morocco: Systematics, ecology and pilot epidemiological studies. Morocco. State PhD thesis, Mohamed V University, Faculty of Sciences of Rabat.

  • Krida, G., Bouattour, A., Rhaim, A., El Kebir, A., & Jlidi, R. (1998). Preliminary investigation of the sensitivity to chlorpyrifos of four larval samples of Anopheles from Tunisia. Archives of the Institut Pasteur in Tunis, 75(3/4), 199–203.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laboudi, M., Faraj, C., Sadak, A., Azelmate, M., Rhajaoui, M. E., & Aouad, R. (2012). Some environmental factors associated with Anopheles labranchiae larval distribution during summer 2009, in Larache province. Morocco. Journal African Entomology, 20(2), 229–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laboudi, M., Sadak, A., & Faraj, C. (2014a). Preliminary breeding trial of Anopheles labranchiae, malaria vector in Morocco. World Journal of Biological Research, 6(1), 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laboudi, M., Sadak, A., Ouahabi, S., Boccolini, D., & Faraj, C. (2014b). Molecular characterization of Anopheles maculipennis complex (Diptera: Culicidae) in Northern Morocco. Journal Faunistic Entomology, 67, 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larhbali, Y., Belghyti, D., El Gyamri, Y., Lahlou, O., El Kharrim, K., Khamri, Z., & El Mahdi, Y. (2010). Sensitivity of two culicid mosquitoes (Anopheles labranchiae and culex pipiens) to insecticides. Bulletin of the Pharmacy Society of Bordeaux, 149, 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louah, A., Ramadani, M., Saoud, Y., & Mahjour, J. (1995). Biotypology of the Culician fauna of the Tingitan peninsula. Bulletin of the Scientific Institute of Rabat, 19, 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • LWBA. (2012). Official data of the Loukkos Water Basin Agency, Tetouan, Morocco.

  • Marliere, F. (2001). Pesticides in the ambient air. Report of the National Institut of Industrial environment and risks (INERIS), 801, France.

  • Murgue, B., Zeller, H., & Deubel, V. (2002). The ecology and epidemiology of west Nile virus in Africa, Europe and Asia. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, 267, 195–221.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, M., Gaven, B., Pasteur, N., & Sinegre, G. (1985). Study of resistance to chlorpyrifos in several strains of the mosquito Culex pipiens L. from the south of France. Genetics Selection Evolution, 17(1), 73–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuffenecker, I., Peyrefitte, C., Harrak, E. L., & M., Murri, S., Leblond, A., Zeller, H. (2003). West Nile virus in Morocco, 2003. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 11(2), 306–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinegre, G. (1984). The resistance of the Culicidae in France. Report of the symposium on reducing the effectiveness of insecticide and acaricide treatments and resistance problems. Paris.

  • Sinegre, G., Gaven, B., & Jullien, J. L. (1977). Comparative activity of 31 insecticides on Culex pipiens (L.) larvae sensitive and resistant to Chlorpyrifos in the South of France. Parasitologia, 19(1–2), 63–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stitou, J. (2002). Study of the salinity of groundwater in the Martil-Alila, Oued Laou and Smir coastal aquifers: Integration of hydrogeochemical, geophysical and isotopic methods. Thesis in hydro-geology, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Tetouan, Morocco.

  • Tachet, H., Richoux, Ph., Bournaud, M., Usseglio polatera, P. (2006). Freshwater invertebrates: Systematics, biology and ecology. 2nd CNRS edition, Paris.

  • Trari, B., & Carnevale, P. (2011). Malaria in Morocco: from pre-elimimation to elimination, what risks for the future? Bulletin De La Société De Pathologie Exotique., 104, 291–295.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (1986). Organophophorus insecticides: a general introduction. World Health Organization Report, Geneva, Switzerland. DC : World Health Organization.

  • WHO. (2005). Safety of pyrethroids for public safety : communicable disease control, prevention and eradication / WHO pesticide evaluation scheme (WHOPES) and protection of the human environment/programme on chemical safety (PCS). World Health Organization Report, Geneva, Switzerland. DC : World Health Organization.

  • WHO. (2005). Guidelines for laboratory and field testing of mosquito larvicides. World Health Organization Report, Geneva, Switzerland. DC : World Health Organization.

  • WHO. (2009). The WHO recommended classification of pesticides by hazard and guidelines to classification (international programme on chemical safety). World Health Organization Report, Geneva, Switzerland. DC : World Health Organization.

  • WHO. (2021). Global insecticide use for vector-borne disease control: a 10-year assessment (2010–2019), sixth edition. World Health Organization Report, Geneva, Switzerland. DC : World Health Organization.

  • WHO. (2022). Guidelines for malaria. WHO global malaria programme. World Health Organization Report, Geneva, Switzerland. DC : World Health Organization.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

OH co-supervises the work and reads, corrects and approves the final manuscript. AL supervises the work and reads, corrects and approves the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariam El Joubari.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El Joubari, M., Louah, A. & Himmi, O. Proposal of a mosquito control plan of Smir-Restinga region (north-west of Morocco). JoBAZ 85, 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41936-024-00353-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41936-024-00353-1

Keywords