Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Hemicriconemoides rosae (Rathour et al., 2003) from mustard rhizosphere in India
The Journal of Basic and Applied Zoology volume 84, Article number: 16 (2023)
Nematodes belonging to Genus Hemicriconemoides, commonly known as sheathoid nematodes, damaged many fruits, vegetables and cash crops, worldwide. A survey has been conducted in the agricultural fields of Bulandshahr district to find out the plant-parasitic nematodes load.
A total of 85 soil samples were collected from mustard fields of Bulandshahr district of Uttar Pradesh and processed for the presence of plant-parasitic nematodes and they were isolated by ‘Cobb sieving method’. Among all the collected soil samples, one soil sample found to be positive for the genus Hemicriconemoides and docketed as HCN. The earliest identification based on morphology revealed the species to be Hemicriconemoides rosae which was recovered from the mustard field for the first time. The morphology was found to be more consistent with rose population as compared to sugarcane population of the Hemicriconemoides rosae. Further, the Hemicriconemoides rosae was identified on the basis of molecular and phylogenetic analysis based on the concatenated matrix. In addition, correlation analysis of the Hemicriconemoides rosae based on morphometric parameters was done. The results revealed the importance of body length and its relation with other morphometric parameters, and they were found significant. Besides this, de Manian index a showed highest correlation with the body length in adult females. In all the studied ratios, a is very important for the evaluation of the females of a specific species of genus Hemicriconemoides. The data from the principal component analysis (PCA) revealed the high intraspecific and interspecific variations between the species of genus Hemicriconemoides. However, less intraspecific variations were present between the rose population and mustard population of H. rosae.
The study revealed the new host, i.e. mustard crops, for H. rosae showing dissimilarity in morphology with the sugarcane population.
There are some nematodes which show association with the plants over millions of years, have resulted in the evolution of plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs). They have been evolved in such a way that they have developed an accessory structure known as stylet with the help of which they are associated with the plants and able to derive the nutrients from them. Genus Hemicriconemoides described by Chitwood and Birchfield (1957) comprises of the species which does not belong to either the genus Hemicycliophora (De Man, 1921) or Criconemoides (Taylor, 1936). The demarcating characteristics possessed by members of this genus are the presence of an extra cuticular sheath in the mature females, presence of large body annules and having lateral and sublateral ridges throughout the length of males giving the appearance of slight caudal alae. These nematodes are commonly known as ‘sheathoid’ nematodes due to the presence of an outer accessory sheath with smooth annuli.
The species of this group have been reported worldwide; however, some of them are native (Geraert, 1966). The nematodes of this genus showed obligatory ectoparasitism (Geraert, 1966). Though they are obligate parasites, they could be migratory, semi-sedentary and sedentary depending upon the environmental conditions (Geraert, 1966).The nematodes of this group were found to be associated with higher plants, mainly woody perennials, vines, etc.(Christie, 1953; Jenkins & Taylor, 1967), and several other plants as a result of which rot, necrosis of leaves, suppressed root growth, root lesions and coarse roots, etc., are common symptoms observed in case of these nematodes.
The genus Hemicriconemoides (Chitwood & Birchfield, 1957) comprises of 54 species (Khan et al., 2019; Maria et al., 2018). Besides this, there were some species which was synonymized by the Geraert (2010). It is interesting to note that 13 species have been reported from the agricultural rich fields of India, i.e. Hemicriconemoides asymmetricus recovered from rose (Rathour et al., 2003; Uttar Pradesh), H. communis isolated from the orange, mango, mulberry, litchi and peach plants (Edward & Misra, 1964; Uttar Pradesh), H. conicaudatus recovered from peach fruits rhizosphere (Phukan & Sanwal, 1983; Assam), H. dipterocarpus recovered from Dipterocarpus tuberculatus (Mohilal et al., 2004; Manipur), H. doonensis from litchi (Srivastava et al., 2000; Uttar Pradesh), H. longistylus from tree fern (Rahman, 1990; Assam), H. mangiferae from litchi, mango amla and ashoka tree (Siddiqi, 1961; all India), H. mehdii from grasses (Suryawanshi, 1971; Maharashtra), H. neobrachyurus from oak, rice pomegranate and rose (Dhanachand & Jairajpuri, 1980; Manipur), H. rosae from rose and sugarcane (Khan et al., 2019; Rathour et al., 2003; Uttar Pradesh), H. rotundoides from Hibiscus rosasinensis (Geraert, 2010;Uttar Pradesh), H. sunderbanensis from mangrove (Ganguly & Khan, 1982; West Bengal) and H. variabilis from peach (Rahman & Ahmad, 1995; Assam). It is noteworthy to mention that only three species out of thirteen have been reported with males, i.e. H. communis, H. mangiferae and H. variabilis. The morphological identification of these species is a tedious task and requires expertise. In some Hemicriconemoides species, males are absent which increases the need for the proper identification of the females and juveniles (if present) (Ashokkumar & Vadivelu, 1990).
There are various species of genus Hemicriconemoides which were encountered from the rhizosphere of various plants irrespective of fruit and vegetable (Edward & Misra, 1964; Edward et al., 1965; Dasgupta et al., 1969; Crozzoli et al., 1998; Siddiqi, 2000; Jain, 2009; Van den Berg et al., 2015). Among all the Hemicriconemoides species, H. rosae was first described from the rose fields of Bareilly district, Uttar Pradesh, India (Rathour et al., 2003), then reported from the sugarcane fields of Meerut district, Uttar Pradesh, India, by Khan et al. (2019). A survey was conducted in the agricultural fields of Bulandshahr district (28°40′ North and 77°86′ East at an altitude of 209 m ASL), Uttar Pradesh, India. One species of the genus Hemicriconemoides recovered from the rhizosphere of mustard fields. The earliest identification based on morphological and some morphometric characters revealed that the isolated population could be H. rosae (Rathour et al., 2003), as it showed resemblance with the original description. The occurrence of H. rosae in the sugarcane and rose fields is very common. However, the species was first time reported from the mustard fields. For more precise identification, molecular and phylogenetic analysis was done. Furthermore, to look for the variations between the species of genus Hemicriconemoides reported worldwide with the studied isolate, principal component analysis (PCA) was also done.
Collection and nematode isolation
The present investigation was carried out in the fields of Bulandshahr district, Uttar Pradesh. The soils were collected from the meadows, pastures, gardens and agricultural fields of district Bulandshahr (28° 40′ North and 77° 86′ East, elevation of 209 m ASL) of Meerut Division. A total of 85 soil samples were collected at a minimum depth of 5–10 cm (Southey, 1974) from the fields. During the collection of samples, it was made sure that the samples were collected from the previous sample at a distance of 5 km. Soil samples (250gm) were collected in the transparent polyzipper bags labelled with the date, host plant, soil type and locality. Further, the soil was brought to Nematology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut, India, for further processing.
Nematode extraction and identification
The nematodes were extracted from the soil, using modified Cobb’s (1918) sieving method and Baermann’s funnel techniques (Goodey, 1957; Southey, 1986). To isolate the plant-parasitic nematodes, 250 g of the soil was taken and then all lumps were broken gently in order to avoid the damage to nematodes. After this, 250 gm of soil was taken in a 5 L bucket which was filled up to 3–4 L water. After topping up with water, it was swirled thoroughly by hand to suspend all particles. The resulting suspension was washed through a 2 mm aperture sieve. The mixture was allowed to settle for about 25 s sedimentation time. After this, the supernatant was decanted through a bank of sieves differing in their aperture size mainly 60 µm, 150 µm, 200 µm, 250 µm, 300 µm, 350 µm and 400 µm, respectively. Then, the residues on the sieves were washed thoroughly with a gentle jet of water and finally collected in a beaker. Water was added to the remaining heavy residues and thoroughly mixed, and again the supernatant was decanted through the same bank of sieves. The sieves were washed, and the residues on the sieves were added to the previously collected. The sievings were shaken gently to suspend all particles before pouring through a 90p aperture nylon screen supported by polyethylene ring (Flegg, 1967), which was immediately placed on a Baermann funnel containing enough water just to submerge the screen surface and debris. After 20 h, about 25 ml of water containing the extracted nematodes from the funnel was taken for examination under a stereoscopic microscope at × 25 or × 50 magnification.
Morphology and morphometry analysis
The adult females were heat killed in Ringer’s solution and then fixed in 50% TAF for 24 h. They were then fixed in 100% TAF for 5–7 days (Courtney et al., 1955) and dehydrated in Seinhorst I and II (Seinhorst, 1959). Further processing was done by following the protocols of Bharti et al. (2020). To prevent nematodes from flattening, they were mounted in a small drop of glycerine on permanent clean glass slides with an extra amount of paraffin wax (Bhat et al., 2019). The phase contrast microscope’s inbuilt software was used to perform observations and measurements are in micrometre (μm). De Manian indices (de Man, 1881) and other ratios were calculated. A drawing tube connected to a Nikon microscope with differential interference contrast optics was used to create line drawings. Images were captured with a Nikon Digital Sight DS-U1 camera and DIC optics on a Nikon microscope. Adobe®Photoshop®CS was used to edit the micrographs.
The DNA was extracted from single virgin females (not having plug at the vulva). The single virgin female from each species/strain was first washed with Ringer’s solution followed by washing in Phosphate buffer saline (pH 7.2). The female from each species/strain was transferred into a sterile Eppendorf tube (500 µl) with extraction buffer 20 µl (ddH20 17.7 µl, 10X Taq buffer with (NH4)2SO4 2 µl, 1% tween2 µl, and proteinase K 0.1 µl). This buffer was frozen at − 80 °C for several days before being incubated at 65 °C for 1 h and subsequently at 95 °C for 10 min. The lysates were chilled on ice and then centrifuged at 6000 × g for 2 min, and 3 μL of supernatant was used for PCR (Bhat et al., 2021). The ITS rDNA was amplified using primers 18S: 5′-TTGATTACGTCCCTGCCCTTT-3′ (forward) and 28S: 5′-TTTCACTCG CCGTTACTAAGG-3′ (reverse) (Vrain et al., 1992) and partial sequence of LSU (28S) gene, D2–D3 domains were amplified using primers, and D2A (5’-ACAAGTACCGTGAGGGAAAGTTG-3’) and D3B (5’-TCGGAAGGAACCAGCTACTA-3’) (De Ley et al., 1999) primer pairs were used. The 30 µl PCR product consisted of 10 µl nuclease free distilled water, 1 µl each forward and reverse primer, 3 µl DNA extract and 15 µl Dream Taq Green PCR master mix 2X (Thermo Scientific). The PCR amplifications were carried out using Verti 96-well fast thermocycler (AP Scientific) with heated lid pre-set at 95ºC and subjected to the following cycling profile: For the ITS rDNA region, PCR conditions included 1 cycle of initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C (denaturation) for 1 min, 55 °C (annealing) for 1 min 30 s or 52 °C (annealing) for 30 s and 72 °C (primer extension) for 1 min, followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 15 min to confirm all of the PCR products are complete length. For the D2D3 rDNA region, PCR conditions included 1 cycle of initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min; followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C (denaturation) for 45 s, 55 °C (annealing) for 45 s and 72 °C (primer extension) for 1 min, followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min to confirm all of the PCR products are complete length. The amplified products were electrophoreses in 1% agarose (w/v) gel using 1 × TAE buffer buffered agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide (45 min, 100 V) was used to assess amplification success (Bharti et al., 2020). The amplified PCR products were purified and sequenced by Bioserve Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad (India). BioEdit was used to edit the newly discovered sequences (Hall, 1999). Sequences were deposited under the accession numbers:
The ITS (Internal transcribed spacer) and D2D3 sequences were BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) for % similarity matches with the previously submitted sequences in the NCBI (National Centre for Biotechnology Information) (Altschul et al., 1990). The conserved regions, i.e. D2D3 and ITS, have been exploited for establishing the relationship among the Hemicriconemoides species. For each amplified rDNA region (ITS and LSU), an alignment of our data with sequences from other closely related species was generated using default ClustalW parameters in MEGA 7.0 (Kumar et al., 2016) and manually optimized in BioEdit (Hall, 1999). The best fit models of nucleotide substitution used for the phylogenetic analysis were selected using jModelTest 2.1.10 (Darriba et al., 2012). Sequences were concatenated with the R package ‘concatipede’ v1.0.0 (Vecchi & Bruneaux, 2021).Bayesian inference (BI) was used to infer the phylogenetic trees from the datasets. Aglenchus agricola were utilized as out-group taxa, with all characteristics being equally weighted and gaps being treated as missing data (Subbotin et al., 2005; Van den Berg et al., 2014; Khan et al., 2019). MrBayes 3.2.7 was used to produce Bayesian phylogenetic reconstructions (Ronquist et al., 2012). The General Time Reversible substitution model with gamma distributed rate variation across sites and a proportion of invariable sites (GTR + G + I) was used as the optimal nucleotide substitution model for the analyses. One tree was preserved per 1000 generations after running Markov chain Monte Carlo generations (MCMC) for 1 × 107 cycles. The tree was visualized and saved with FigTree 1.4.4 (Rambaut, 2018).
Correlation analysis and linear regression analysis were performed to resolve the relationship between various morphometrical parameters using GraphPad Prism software (version 6.0). Principal component analysis (PCA) was done to find out the morphological variations between the isolated nematodes in the present investigation and closely related species of the nematodes. The measurements of the Hemicriconemoides species were collected from their original descriptions. The 2D plot was formed by using the PC1 and PC2 values of each isolate based on eigenvalues given by the software MINITAB 20 (Nisa et al., 2021).
In the present investigation, HCN strain recovered from one soil sample out of 85 soil samples collected from the rhizosphere of mustard from Bulandshahr district. The strain was found to be plant-parasitic nematodes due to presence of long stylet on the labial region. The pH of the soil was 5.4, and the texture of the soil was found to be alluvial. Most of the sampling was done in the winter season mainly in January–March. The strains HCN bear double cuticle, which is a characteristic feature of Hemicriconemoides, thus belong to same genus.
Based on morphology and morphometry, these nematodes were found close to Hemicriconemoides rosae, hence described as the same. In the present study, only females of the strain HCN were recovered as noted in the original descriptions. For the morphological characterizations, permanent slides were prepared and deposited in the Nematology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Ch. Charan Singh University, India.
Present specimen (HCN) showed close resemblances to the Hemicriconemoides rosae (Rathour et al., 2003) in morphological observations with respect to the presence of a prominent and elevated labial disc, long stylet, pharynx distinct and separated from intestine. Besides this, vulva was enclosed with well-developed membranous sheath, presence of conoid tail which is dorsally convex at the tail tip, and hence, it was considered as the same (Fig. 1). Line drawings were prepared for comprehensive analysis (Fig. 2). However, few morphometrical characters showed little variation from each other.
Small in size 0.37–0.47 mm in length. Body straight to slightly arcuate ventrally after heat killed. Sheath closely fit to the body except on tail and frequently protruding forward over the lip region. Sheath is not annulated at vulval region. Cuticle smooth and covered by outer accessory layer/sheath with smooth annules. Body annuli distinct and rounded (Fig. 1). Lip region rounded with a prominent labial disc, not set off with two annuli, first annuli smaller than second (Fig. 1, Table 1). Stylet long (50-58 µm), well developed with stylet knobs (2.4–4.0 µm) prominently anchor-shaped anteriorly and rounded posteriorly, 4.8–6.9 µm wide (Fig. 1, Table 1). Dorsal pharyngeal gland opening situated at the base of stylet knobs. Median bulb observed with prominent valve. Procorpus and metacorpus found to be fused. Excretory pore situated from 5–11 annuli posterior to the base of pharynx. Hemizonid not found. Sheath annuli smooth, slightly indented over the whole length. Anastomoses found absent. Vulva posterior, located 8–13 annuli from terminus and 90–94% of body length (Fig. 1, Table 1). Flap like structure absent on vulva but with a prominent membranous sheath. Spermatheca well developed and oval shape filled with sperm cells (Fig. 1). Vagina observed distinct and straight. Body found to be tapering posterior to anus. Tail shape conoid and found dorsally convex with the sheath enclosing the tip, tapering gradually to a more pointed tip. Anus position was uncertain still it was located just posterior to vulva 2–5 annuli (Table 1).
Males are absent.
Comparative study of H. rosae strain (HCN) and H. rosae (Rathour et al., 2003 )
As far as females was concerned, most of the morphometric parameters of isolate (HCN) and original species was found to be approximately similar. The other measurements, i.e. a (13.6–16.9 vs 16.0–17.6), b (4.6–5.6 vs 4.9–5.4), V (90–95 vs 92–94.5), stylet length (50–58 vs 50–55 µm), metenchium length (40–49 vs 44.8 µm), telenchium length (9–11.8 vs 7.7 µm), stylet knob width (4.8–6.9 vs 6.9 µm), labial disc diameter (4.3–5.9 vs 5.1 µm), R (102–115 vs 116), Rst (12–20 vs 12–14), Roes (20–22 vs 21–26) of present strain, were found close to the original description H. rosae (Rathour et al., 2003). All the body parameters were found to be close except body length (376–472 µm vs 470–510 µm), the length of the pharynx (72–94 vs 102 µm) and number of annuli posterior to vulva (8–13 vs 6–9) which showed deviation from the original description.
Hemicriconemoides rosae isolate (HCN) was compared with H. rosae Khan et al.(2019) sugarcane population and three closely related species of Hemicriconemoides, and it differs in some morphological and morphometric characters with compared species. The comparison of morphometrics is presented in Tables 1 and 2 and is described as follows:
The present isolate HCN of Hemicriconemoides rosae recovered from mustard were found to show some variations from the H. rosae (Khan et al., 2019) sugarcane population. The parameters which show deviations were: average body length (376–472 vs 323-486 µm), ratio a (13.6–16.9vs 12.2–18.7), ratio b (4.6–5.6 vs 3.88–5.93), telenchium length (9–11.8 vs 5.1–10.8 µm), stylet (50–58 vs 52-61 µm) and annulus width (3.6–5.2 vs 2.9–3.8 µm) (Table 1).
Hemicriconemoides rosae HCN females were differentiated from the H. communis Edward and Misra (1964) in terms of number of sheath annuli, anus position, anterior secretory to excretory position and the presence of males. H. communis was found to have more annuli than H. rosae (102–115 vs 110–130), smaller VL/VB (0.9–2.0 vs 1.3–2.0). The position of anus is uncertain in H. rosae; however, anus is clearly visible in H. communis. Males are present in H. communis, whereas in H. rosae no males were observed (Table 2).
Based on morphological characterization, H. rosae HCN was separated from the H. wessoni Chitwood and Birchfield (1957) in terms of ratio a, c and other parameters. The ratio a of H. wessoni (12.3–14.8) was found to be smaller when compared with H. rosae (13.6–16.9). The ratio c of H. wessoni (16.2–22.9) is larger when compared with H. rosae (14.1–20). Besides this, other characteristics of the H. rosae isolate HCN showed differences with the H. wessoni such as tail shape and labial disc. The labial disc in case of H. rosae was found to be elevated, whereas in case of H. wessoni, slight or no elevation was observed. The pharyngeal bulb in H. rosae showed no overlapping; however, in H. wessoni dorsal overlapping was present. The shape of the tail in H. rosae was found to be conoid and the membranous sheath enclosed the tail tip dorsally, whereas in H. wessoni the tail shape was found to be conoid but membranous sheath may or may not enclose the tail tip (Table 2).
The H. rosae isolate HCN showed differences from the H. minutus Esser (1960) in terms of de Manian indices, i.e. a and b, stylet and pharyngeal bulb. The ratios a (13.6–16.9 vs 10.3–16.4) and b (4.6–5.6 vs 3.0–3.8) of H. rosae were found to be higher than H. minutus. The stylet length of H. rosae was found to be smaller than H. minutus (50–58 vs 70.5–80.5 µm). The pharyngeal bulb of H. rosae showed no overlapping, while in case of H. minutus overlapping was present.
Principal component analysis
Principal component analysis was done using morphometric data of the nematode isolates, i.e. H. communis (Edward and Misra 1964), H. wessoni (Chitwood & Birchfield, 1957), H. californianus (Pinochet & Raski, 1975), H. macrodorus (Volvas et al., 2000), H. chitwoodi (Esser, 1960), H. parataiwanensis (Decraemer & Geraert, 1992), H. paracamelliae (Maria et al., 2018), H. kanayaensis (Nakasono & Ichinohe, 1961), H. phoenicis (Van den Berg et al., 2015), H. litchi (Edward & Misra, 1964), H. strictathecatus (Esser, 1960), H. cocophilus (Dasgupta et al., 1969), H. brachyurus (Dasgupta et al., 1969) isolated from different geographical areas and the studied isolate HCN.
The results of the PCA showed that there are variations in the morphometry between the Hemicriconemoides rosae isolate HCN recovered from mustard in the present investigation and the Hemicriconemoides rosae (Khan et al., 2019) isolated from the sugarcane and with the other species of Hemicriconemoides species (Dasgupta et al., 1969). However, the analysed parameters of morphometry showed less variations between the present isolate HCN with the originally described Hemicriconemoides rosae (Rathour et al., 2003) (Fig. 3). Besides this, the isolates showed differences from the other Hemicriconemoides species (Fig. 3).
The PCA based on the morphometry of females showed an accumulated variability of 66.2% (Fig. 3). The contribution of PC1 and PC2 was found out to be 43.3% and 22.9%, respectively (Fig. 3). Four parameters, annulus width (r = -0.06), b (r = -0.16), stylet knob width (r = -0.15) and V% (r = -0.17) were found to be negatively correlated across nematode/species in PC1. Ten characters out of fourteen characters were found to be positively correlated across isolates, and the remaining characters were negatively correlated considering PC1 (Fig. 3). The highest coefficient of correlation was observed in annuli from anus to tail terminus (r = 0.38) and annuli from anterior extremity to base of stylet (r = 0.37) in PC1. Considering PC2, nine characters out of fourteen were found to be positively correlated and the remaining were negatively correlated (Fig. 3, Table 3). The highest coefficient of correlation was observed in b (r = 0.43) PC2.
The Hemicriconemoides species isolate HCN examined in present study has been characterized molecularly by the sequences of two genes, i.e. ITS rDNA (695 bp) and D2D3 fragments of 28S rDNA (708 bp). The ITS and D2D3 sequences of Hemicriconemoides rosae isolate HCN were deposited in NCBI GenBank with accession number ON844213 and ON844212, respectively.
Pairwise distances (Kimura 2-parameter) based on the ITS regions revealed the genetic distances between the Hemicriconemoides species. The present isolate HCN (ON844213) genetic distance with previously described Hemicriconemoides rosae (MK371815, MK371814, and MK371816) was found to be 0.0000. The present isolate Hemicriconemoides rosae HCN (ON844213) showed greatest genetic distance (0.1915) from H. kanayaensis (MG029568). The average overall genetic distance between in-group species was 0.1675 ranging from 0.0000 to 0.3055 between H. rosae (MK371815, MK371814, MK371816) and H. kanayaensis (MG029568) (Additional file 1: S1).
The average overall genetic distance (Kimura 2-parameter) based on D2D3 regions between in-group species was 0.1336 ranging from 0.0000 between H. rosae (MK371813) and H. rosae (MK371811) to 0.2326 between H. minutus (KF856516) and H. parataiwanensis (MG029573) (Additional file 2: S2).
ITS and D2D3 regions are well-conserved regions in the nematodes and are used to ascertain the relationship between closely and distantly related species. The phylogenetic relatedness of the Hemicriconemoides rosae with other species of Hemicriconemoides was established from the comparison of concatenated sequences (Fig. 4, Additional file 3: S3). There are two major clades in the rDNA phylogenetic tree of Hemicriconemoides. It is interesting to note that the phylogenetic analysis was in agreement with the morphology and molecular analysis. The first cluster includes the Hemicriconemoides brachyurus, H. cocophilus, H. ortonwilliamsi, H. minutus, H wessoni, H. macrodorus and H. promissus. The second cluster includes the Hemicriconemoides rosae HCN, Hemicriconemoides rosae and Hemicriconemoides species. A thorough analysis of sequences of the 28S and ITS rDNA gene of the HCN isolate described in this study reveals clear relatedness with 18 other Hemicriconemoides species. Bayesian inference phylogenetic analyses based on the concatenated sequences (ITS and 28S rDNA) showed a clear monophyly of the group formed by the isolate HCN and already described Hemicriconemoides rosae Khan et al. (2019) (Fig. 4, Additional file 3: S3).
Relationship between various morphometric parameters
The results obtained from the two tailed Pearson’s correlation analysis revealed that some parameters of Hemicriconemoides rosae isolate HCN showed significant correlation with other morphometric parameters (Table 4). The morphometric parameters which were focused in the study to understand the relation between various parameters were body length, excretory pore, tail, pharynx stylet, de Manian indices a, b, c and c’, nerve ring, vulva width and other parameters. In this, 15 females of the isolate HCN were analysed to figure out the correlation between the morphometric data. Each morphometric parameter was replicated 3 times to get the final results.
The results based on the two-tailed Pearson’s correlation suggested that body length has highest correlation in comparison with others with the morphometric data. Though body length showed correlation with the analysed parameters, no correlation has been observed with the de Man indices except a ratio of female which showed positive correlation (r = 0.6978, p = 0.0038) (Fig. 5, Table 4). The index a also showed positive correlation with other parameters, i.e. excretory pore (r = 0.7389, p = 0.0017, Table 4), oesophageal bulb (r = 0.6953, p = 0.0040, Table 4), vulva-anterior end (r = 0.7538, p = 0.0012, Table 4). However, index a showed no correlation with other indices (Table 4). The index b showed positive correlation with the index c (r = 0.5689, p = 0.0269, Table 4) and negative correlation with pharynx (r = − 0.5443, p = 0.0359, Table 4). Among all the parameters, the c’ showed positive correlation with the tail (r = 0.5966, p = 0.0189, Table 4) and negative correlation with index c (r = − 0.6779, p = 0.0055, Table 4). These observations suggested that body length, vulva position, de Manian index ‘a’ are important for the evaluation of the females of Hemicriconemoides rosae.
Hemicriconemoides was first described by Chitwood & Birchfield, 1957 and further redescribed by Dasgupta et al., 1969. These nematodes are commonly referred to as sheathoid nematodes due to the body cuticle of female covered by an outer accessory layer/sheath with smooth annules which is missing in juveniles. They are mostly distributed in temperate areas of the world mainly in Africa, America, Australia and South Asia and South Europe. This genus contains 54 valid species (Geraert, 2010; Khan et al., 2019) and is associated with many crops.
The H. rosae (Rathour et al., 2003) possessed very less morphological and morphometric characters which were used for the comparison with the studied isolate HCN. The morphological data of the HCN isolate showed much resemblance with the original description of the H. rosae (Rathour et al., 2003); however, it showed more deviation from the sugarcane population of H. rosae (Khan et al., 2019) (Table 1).
The various morphometric characters are not sufficient for the delineation of the species. Molecular characterization is essential in order to validate the taxonomic position as well as the authenticity and phylogenetic relationships among the species of a particular genus and between different nematode orders. The molecular analysis based on the conserved regions ITS and D2D3 revealed the present isolate HCN to be H. rosae as it showed very less genetic distance from the already described H. rosae (ITS:0.0000, D2D3: 0.0014, 0.0129) (Additional file 1: S1 and Additional file 2: S2).
The phylogenetic analysis was found to be consistent with the molecular data which revealed that the present isolate to be H. rosae (Fig. 4). The phylogenetic analysis based on the concatenated sequences (ITS and D2D3) region revealed that mustard population of H. rosae HCN formed a monophyletic clade with the sugarcane population of H. rosae with a Bayesian posterior probability 1. The phylogenetic tree revealed that H. rosae formed a separate branch without including any other Hemicriconemoides species, however, the position of H. rosae in the phylogenetic tree was close to H. promissus, H. macrodorus, H. wessoni and H. minutus which found to be consistent with the previous observations (Khan et al., 2019).
The PCA showed large intraspecific and interspecific variations. These variations were found to be independent of the collection localities of soil samples. It was evident from the previous studies that there were large intraspecific variations present among the nematodes which was also observed among the present isolate HCN (mustard population) and Hemicriconemoides rosae (sugarcane population) isolates of the present investigation (Khan et al., 2019). However, less intraspecific variations were observed between present isolate HCN and originally described Hemicriconemoides rosae (Rathour et al., 2003) (Fig. 3, Table 3).
The results obtained from the analysis of morphometric data based on two tailed Pearson’s correlation revealed that in case of females of H. rosae, de Manian index a is very important for the evaluation as it showed positive correlation with body length (Fig. 5, Table 4). Similar results were observed in the genus Eucephalobus and Acrobeles (Amirzadi et al., 2011, 2013). The results of Fortuner (1990) also exhibited the highest correlation between the de Manian indices especially a and b and the length. Furthermore, the other ratios, i.e. V also important along with the de Manian indices, i.e. a, c and c’ which is also consistent with the previous findings (Fortuner, 1984). It was found from the previous studies that a, c and c’ de Manian indices are essential for the genus Helicotylenchus Steiner, 1945. Similar findings were obtained by Amirzadi et al. (2013) for genus Acrobeles von Linstow (1877) where correlation between de Manian indices (b and c’) and body length was found positive. The present study on the females of genus Hemicriconemoides also revealed the positive correlation between the body length and ratio a (Fig. 5, Table 4). The reason behind that some morphological characters showed highest degree of correlation; however, some of them showed least might be due to control of those characters by a specific gene cluster (Amirzadi et al., 2013). It can be concluded from the results that there are some characters which showed high correlation with body length which results in the increase or decrease in the characters with the body length (Fig. 5, Table 4).
The present isolate HCN were identified as H. rosae based on the morphological, molecular and phylogenetic analysis. The infection of H. rosae in the sugarcane and rose fields is very high in the western Uttar Pradesh, India (Khan et al., 2019; Rathour et al., 2003). The present investigation was carried out in the fields of mustard which is an alarming sign as mustard is one of the cash crops of India having economic importance. From the studies, it is clear that species of genus Hemicriconemoides possess certain characteristics which cause potent damage to the crops, ultimately affecting the yield (Inserra et al., 2014; Maria et al., 2018). The information revealed from the present investigation can be exploited by taxonomists for the comparison, identification and correlation between the morphometric parameters of the species.
Availability of data and materials
The data and material of this manuscript are available from corresponding author on reasonable request.
Bhat, A. H., Chaubey, A. K., Shokoohi, E., & Mashela, P. W. (2019). Study of Steinernema hermaphroditum(Nematoda, Rhabditida) from the West Uttar Pradesh, India. Acta Parasitologica, 64, 720–737. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11686-019-00061-9
Bhat, A. H., Rana, A., Chaubey, A. K., Shokoohi, E., & Machado, R. A. R. (2021). Characterisation of Steinernema abbasi (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) isolated from Indian agricultural soils and their efficacy against insect pests. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 31, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2021.1917514
Courtney, W. D., Polley, D., & Miller, V. L. (1955). TAF, an improved fixative in nematode technique. Plant Disease Reporter, 39, 570–571.
De Man, J. G. (1881). Die einheimischen, frei in der reinen Erde und im süssen Wasser lebenden Nematoden monographisch bearbeitet. Tijdschrift Der Nederlandsche Dierkundige Vereeniging, 5, 1–104.
De Man, J. G. (1921). Nouvelles recherches sur les nematodes libres terricoles. Capita Zoologica, 1, 1–62.
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology, 215, 403–410.
Amirzadi, N., Shokoohi, E., Eskandari, A.,&Abolafia, J. (2011). Correlation of morphometric data among different population of Eucephalobus Bastian, 1865 species from Iran. In 9th International nematology symposium proceeding, Petrozavodsk, Russia: 5 p.
Amirzadi, N., Shokoohi, E., & Abolafia, J. (2013). Description of nine species of the family Cephalobidae (Nematoda, Rhabditida) and morphometric analysis in the genus Acrobeles VON LINSTOW, 1877. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica, 65.
Ashokkumar, P., & Vadivelu, S. (1990). Description of developmental stages of Hemicriconemoides mangiferae Siddiqi, 1961 (Nemata: Criconematidae). Revue De Nématologie, 13, 317–322.
Bharti, L., Bhat, A. H., Chaubey, A. K., & Abolofia, J. (2020). Morphological and molecular characterization of Merlinius brevidens (Allen, 1955) Siddiqi, 1970 (Rhabditida, Tylenchomorpha) on mustard crop from Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Natural History, 54, 1477–1498.
Chitwood, B. G., & Birchfield, W. (1957). A new genus, Hemicriconemoides (Criconematidae, Tylenchida). Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 24, 80–86.
Christie, J. R. (1953). Ectoparasitic nematodes of plants. Phytopathology, 43, 295–297.
Cobb, N. A. (1918). Estimating the nema population of the soil. Technology Bureau of Plant Industry, United States Department of Agriculture, Circular No. 1.
Crozzoli, R., Lamberti, F., Greco, N., & Rivas, D. (1998). Plant parasitic nematodes associated with citrus in Venezuela. Nematologia Mediterranea, 26, 31–58.
Darriba, D., Taboada, G. L., Doallo, R., & Posada, D. (2012). jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods, 9, 772. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2109
Dasgupta, D. R., Raski, D. J., & Van Gundy, S. D. (1969). Revision of the genus Hemicriconemoides Chitwood & Birchfield, 1957 (Nematoda: Criconematidae). Journal of Nematology, 1, 126–145.
De Ley, P., Félix, M. A., Frisse, L. M., Nadler, S. A., Sternberg, P. W., & Thomas, W. K. (1999). Molecular and morphological characterisation of two reproductively isolated species with mirror-image anatomy (Nematoda: Cephalobidae). Nematology, 1, 591–612.
Decraemer, W., & Geraert, E. (1992). Description of Hemicriconemoides parataiwanensis sp. n. (Criconematidae) and four other Hemicriconemoides species from Papua New Guinea with a consideration of variability in the genus. Nematologica, 38, 267–295.
Dhanachand, C., & Jairajpuri, M. S. (1980). Hemicriconemoides neobrachyurus sp. n. and Hemicaloosia luci sp. n. (Nema toda: Criconematoidea) from Manipur. India. Indian Journal of Nematology, 9, 111–116.
Edward, J. C., & Misra, S. L. (1964). Hemicriconemoides communis n. sp. and H. litchi n. sp. (Nematoda: Criconematidae) from Uttar Pradesh, India. Nematologica, 9, 405–411.
Edward, J. C., Misra, S. L., & Singh, G. R. (1965). Hemicriconemoides birchfieldi n. sp. (Nematoda: Criconematidae) from Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India; with a revision of the key to species of Hemicriconemoides. Nematologica, 11, 157–161.
Esser, R. P. (1960). Three additional species in the genus Hemicriconemoides Chitwood & Birchfield, 1957 (Nemata: Tylenchida). Nematologica, 5, 64–71.
Flegg, J. J. M. (1967). Extraction of Xiphinema and Longidorus species from soil by a modification of Cobb’s decanting and sieving technique. Annals of Applied Biology, 60, 429–437.
Fortuner, R. (1984). Morphometrical variability in Helicotylenchus Steiner, 1945. 5: On the validity of ratios. Revue De Nématologie, 7, 137–146.
Fortuner, R. (1990). Ratios and indexes in nematode taxonomy. Nematologica, 36, 205–216.
Ganguly, S., & Khan, E. (1982). Hemicriconemoides sunderbanensis n. sp. (Nematoda: Criconematoidea) from West Bengal. Indian Journal of Nematology, 11, 241–243.
Geraert, E. (1966). The systematic position of the families tylenchulidae and criconematidae. Nematologica, 12, 362–368.
Geraert, E. (2010). The Criconematidae of the world. Ghent, Belgium, Academia Press.
Goodey, J. B. (1957). Laboratory methods for work with plant and soil nematodes. Technical Bulletin No. 2 Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London, 47pp.
Hall, T. A. (1999). BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment and analysis program for Windows 95/98.NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series, 41, 95–98.
Inserra, R. N., Stanley, J. D., Ochoa, A., Schubert, T. S., Subbotin, A. A., Crow, W. T., & McSorley, R. (2014). Hemicriconemoides species as crop damaging parasitic nematodes in Florida. Nematology Circular No. 223. FL, USA, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry.
Jain, A. K. (2009). Nematode pests of small millets: A review. Agricultural Reviews, 30, 132–138.
Jenkins, W. R., & Taylor, D. P. (1967). Plant hematology (p. 270). Reinhold Publishing Corporation.
Khan, M. R., Phani, V., Chauhan, K., Somvanshi, V., Pervez, R., & Walia, R. (2019). Redescription and molecular characterisation of Hemicriconemoides rosae Rathour, Sharma, Singh & Ganguly, 2003 from rhizosphere of sugarcane in India. Nematology, 21, 1–12.
Kumar, S., Stecher, G., & Tamura, K. (2016). MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 33, 1870–1874.
Maria, M., Cai, R., Castillo, P., & Zheng, J. (2018). Morphological and molecular characterisation of Hemicriconemoides paracamelliae sp. n. (Nematoda: Criconematidae) and two known species of Hemicriconemoides from China. Nematology, 20, 403–422.
Mohilal, N., Anandi, Y., & Dhanachand, C. (2004). Two known and one new species of Nemata from Manipur. Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Zoology, 24, 73–78.
Nakasono, K., & Ichinohe, M. (1961). Hemicriconemoides kanayaensis n. sp. associated with tea root in Japan (Nematoda: Criconematidae). Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology, 5, 273–276.
Nisa, R. U., Tantray, A., Kouser, N., Allie, K., Wani, S. M., Alamri, S., Alyemeni, M., Wijaya, L.,& Shah, A. (2021). Influence of ecological and edaphic factors on biodiversity of soil nematodes. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 28.
Phukan, P. N., & Sanwal, K. C. (1983). Two new species of Hemicriconemoides Chitwood & Birchfield, 1957 (Nematoda: Criconematidae) from Assam, India. Indian Journal of Nematology, 15, 215–220.
Pinochet, J., & Raski, D. J. (1975). Four new species of the genus Hemicriconemoides (Nematoda: Criconematidae). Journal of Nematology, 7, 263–270.
Rahaman, P. F., & Ahmad, I. (1995). Hemicriconemoides variabilis sp. n. and two known species of Hemicriconemoides from India. Nematologia Mediterranea, 23, 203–210.
Rahman, M. F. (1990). Some new and known species of the suborder Criconematina Siddiqi, 1980. Journal of Research-Assam Agricultural University, 8, 36–40.
Rambaut, A. (2018). Figtree, a graphical viewer of phylogenetic trees, version 1.4.4. Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, available at: https://github.com/rambaut/figtree/releases/tag/v1.4.4.
Rathour, K. S., Sharma, S., Singh, K., & Ganguly, S. (2003). Three new species of Hemicriconemoides (Nematoda: Tylenchida: Criconematina) associated with ornamental plants in Bareilly district of Uttar Pradesh, India. Indian Journal of Nematology, 33, 160–166.
Ronquist, F., Teslenko, M., van der Mark, P., Ayres, D. L., Darling, A., Höhna, S., Larget, B., Liu, L., Suchard, M. A., & Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2012). MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology, 61, 539–542.
Seinhorst, J. W. (1959). A rapid method for the transfer of nematodes from fixative to anhydrous glycerin. Nematologica, 4, 67–69. https://doi.org/10.1163/187529259X00381
Siddiqi, M. R. (1961). Studies on species of Criconematinae (Nematoda: Tylenchida). Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 28, 19–34.
Siddiqi, M. R. (2000). Tylenchida parasites of plants and insects (2nd ed.). Wallingford.
Southey, J. F. (1974). Methods for Detection of Potato Cyst Nematodes 1. EPPO Bulletin, 4(4), 463–473.
Southey, J. F. (1986). Laboratory methods for work with plant and soil nematodes.Ministery of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Reference Book 402, London.
Srivastava, N., Rawat, V. S., & Ahmad, M. (2000). Description of new species of Hemicriconemoides (Nematoda: Tylenchida) associated with litchi fruit trees in Doon Valley (UP), India. Indian Journal of Nematology, 30, 97–99.
Steiner, G. (1945). Helicotylenchus, a new genus of plant-parasitic nematodes and its relationship to Rotylenchus Filipjev. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 12, 34–38.
Subbotin, S. A., Vovlas, N., Crozzoli, R., Sturhan, D., Lamberti, F., Moens, M., & Baldwin, J. G. (2005). Phylogeny of Criconematina Siddiqi, 1980 (Nematoda: Tylenchida) based on morphology and D2–D3 expansion segments of the 28S-rRNA gene sequences with application of a secondary structure model. Nematology, 7, 927–944.
Suryawanshi, M. V. (1971). Studies on Tylenchida (Nematoda) from Marathwada, India, with description of four new species. Nematologica, 17, 393–406.
Taylor, A. L. (1936). The genera and species of the Criconematinae, a sub-family of the Anguillulinidae (Nematoda). Transactions of the American Microscopical Society, 55, 391–421.
Van den Berg, E., Tiedt, L.R., Inserra, R. N., Stanley, J. D., Vovlas, N., Palomares-Rius, J. E., Castillo, P., & Subbotin, S. A. (2014). Morphological and molecular characterisation of some Hemicriconemoides species (Nematoda: Criconematidae) together with a phylogeny of the genus. Nematology, 14.
Van den Berg, E., Tiedt, L. R., Inserra, R., Stanley, J. D., Vovlas, N., Palomares-Rius, J. E., Castillo, P., & Subbotin, S. A. (2015). Characterisation of a topotype and other populations of Hemicriconemoides strictathecatus Esser, 1960 (Nematoda: Criconematidae) from Florida with description of H. phoenicis sp. n. from the USA. Nematology, 17, 265300.
Vecchi, M., & Bruneaux, M. (2021). Concatipede: an R package to concatenate fasta sequences easily. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5130604
von Linstow, O. F. B. (1877). Helminthologica. Archiv Für Naturgeschichte, 43, 1–18.
Vovlas, N., Troccoli, A., & Castillo, P. (2000). Hemicriconemoides macrodorus n. sp. with observations on two other species of the genus (Nematoda: Criconematidae). Nematology, 2, 395–405.
Vrain, T. C., Wakarchuk, D. A., Levesque, A. C., & Hamilton, R. I. (1992). Intraspecific rDNA restriction fragment length polymorphismin the Xiphinema americanum group. Fundamental and Applied Nematology, 15, 563–573.
The authors are thankful to the Department of Zoology, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut, for providing necessary laboratory facilities for conducting the experiments. The authors are grateful to local farmers for their assistance in sample collection. The authors are also thankful to Dr. Abhilash Prabhat for his assistance in statistical analysis. The authors extended their sincere thanks to Lovely Bharti for helping in morphological identification.
The authors declare that no funds, grants or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals.
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
. Pairwise distances (Kimura 2-parameter) between species of Hemicriconemoides based on ITS (Internal transcribed spacer) regions. Out-groups were not included.
. Pairwise distances (Kimura 2-parameter) of the between Hemicriconemoides species based on D2D3 (Large ribosomal subunit, 28S) regions. Out-groups were not included.
. List of GenBank accession numbers of the Hemicriconemoides species used in the phylogenetic tree.
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, H., Chaubey, A.K. Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Hemicriconemoides rosae (Rathour et al., 2003) from mustard rhizosphere in India. JoBAZ 84, 16 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41936-023-00338-6